Nineteen hundred? A forecast and a storyFarningham, Marianne
General
Nineteen hundred? A forecast and a story
Farningham, Marianne
Christian life -- Fiction; England -- Social conditions -- Fiction; Reformers -- Fiction
“This is a case for arbitration!” said the Government. And so it might
have been if they could have induced the nation to keep quiet and cool
for a little time. But that curious general irritability of temper which
in the world’s history has so often been the cause of mischief, made the
multitude impatient and impassioned at this crisis. The cry for
Arbitration was loud, but the cry for War was louder. And it gathered in
force, day by day, until it seemed overpowering.
It is humiliating to have to make the confession that even the Church
was not unitedly and entirely for peace. A large section was overwhelmed
with sorrow and disappointment on this account, and most earnestly
seconded the endeavour of the Government; but the men of peace had less
power than they thought they had. They made pathetic appeals to the
nation, but a large part of the nation refused to be moved by them. The
peace-people had soft voices, but the war-sowers were noisy and
clamorous, and drowned the pacific suggestions of the others. The
Government proposed that a council of arbitration should sit in Germany,
and that other nations should be asked to come between the two angered
peoples. But the English war party was in haste, and would not consent
to the delay. “Let us pray,” became the burden of many a sermon; but
“Let us fight!” was the suggestion more in keeping with the popular
temper of the times.
Public pressure began to be increased. “A war would be good for trade,”
some said. Religion was all very well, but it would not always do to
abide by it. Besides, did not religion uphold war? Of course it did, for
the Bible was a book of battles. The new leaders of the people might be
deposed unless they proved themselves capable of responding to the
popular wish. Some of the newspapers were to blame for the agitation.
There were bloodthirsty leader-writers who were nothing less than
traitors to their country at this juncture. And there were agitators who
still further inflamed the passions of the people, until at last it was
proposed that the “Patriotic Party”—for such the war-makers impudently
called themselves—should form processions in the streets, and even storm
the Houses of Parliament, and compel the Government to obey their will.
And then _the Prince_ came forward.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account