Nineteen hundred? A forecast and a storyFarningham, Marianne
General
Nineteen hundred? A forecast and a story
Farningham, Marianne
Christian life -- Fiction; England -- Social conditions -- Fiction; Reformers -- Fiction
“‘I will do so,’ said a blunt, uneducated man, ‘and I cry shame on any
church which, for the sake of adorning its building, will in such a
way as Mr. Shelve proposes thus make friends of the mammon of
unrighteousness.’
“‘Sir,’ said another, ‘I move that the grateful thanks of this church
be presented to Mr. Quellset for his munificent gift. We have been
patiently listening to a lot of arrant nonsense. We have nothing to do
with the way in which a man chooses to make his money. If we had, I
should say that Mr. Quellset has done the country more good than harm.
He has found a new employment for men, women, and children. He pays
better wages for box-making and all the other branches of his
industries than they could earn in many ways. It is not yet proved
that opium does more harm than alcohol; and, for my own part, I
believe that all these good gifts of God, taken in moderation, are
useful. And, besides, beggars must not be choosers, and it would be an
insane thing to return a man’s money when we need it so much.’
“Nevertheless” [added the journal], “this Quixotic company of saints
decided by a majority to return the cash, and pay its debts by the
practice of its own self-denial and generosity.”
There were many quiet souls filled with piety and patriotism who thanked
God and took courage when they heard this, for there was a leaven
working in the real Christian society of the day which was destined
eventually to bring about a marvellous change.
And this change, like almost everything else in England, had to do with
politics.
CHAPTER IX.
IN THE AUTUMN.
Little Darentdale led the way.
The summer had not yet died into winter, nor had the leisure which comes
into a country parish with the short days and long evenings left the
thoughts of the people free. Nevertheless, some time and thought were
given to an experiment which John Dallington, urged by Arthur Knight,
had proposed should be tested in the village. The village was a small
one, and it was almost wholly agricultural. There were about thirty
persons who were employers of labour, and the rest were employed by
them. Thirteen were looked up to as belonging to the moneyed classes,
and of these, Mr. Whitwell—who lived out of the village, but had
property in it—and John Dallington were the principal individuals. They
employed on their farms the largest number of labourers, but besides
these there were two smaller farmers, and several other persons who
owned or rented a few acres of land, a gentleman who had retired from
his business in London and had bought a good-sized house and garden, a
lady of limited income, who kept one servant, and the general
shopkeeper, who combined the businesses of chemist and druggist, draper,
grocer, and coal dealer, all in one. There were, besides, two bakers, a
blacksmith, a butcher, four publicans, and Henry Harris.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account