No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of ChristPenn, William
Religion
No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of Christ
Penn, William
Christian life; Christian life -- Quaker authors; Self-denial -- Early works to 1800
VIII. O, but he pleads an exemption by his office: what! Shall he
breed up chickens to pick out his own eyes! Be rebuked or instructed
by a layman or parishioner! A man of less age, learning, or ability!
No such matter: he would have us believe that his ministerial
prerogative has placed him out of the reach of popular impeachment.
He is not subject to vulgar judgments. Even questions about
religion are schism: believe as he says: it is not for you to pry
so curiously into the mysteries of religion: never good day since
laymen meddle so much with the minister's office. Not considering,
poor man, that the contrary is most true: not many good days since
ministers meddled so much in laymen's business. Though perhaps there
is little reason for this distinction, besides spiritual gifts, and
the improvement of them by a diligent use of them for the good of
others.
Such good sayings as these, Be ready to teach: answer with meekness:
let every man speak as of the gift of God that is in him: if
anything be revealed to him that sits by, let the first hold his
peace: be not lords over God's heritage, but meek and lowly; washing
the feet of the people, (1 Cor. xiv. 30,) as Jesus did those of his
poor disciples;--are unreasonable and antiquated instructions with
some clergy, and it is little less than heresy to remind them of
these things: a mark of great disaffection to the church in their
opinion. For by this time their pride has made them the church, and
the people but the porch at best; a cipher that signifies nothing,
unless they clap their figure before it: forgetting, that if they
were as good as they should be, they could be but ministers,
stewards, and under-shepherds; that is, servants to the church,
family, flock, and heritage of God: and not that they are that
church, family, flock, and heritage, which they are only servants
unto. Remember the words of Christ, "Let him that would be greatest
be your servant." (Mat. xx. 26.)
IX. There is but one place to be found in the Holy Scripture, where
the word _Clerus_, can properly be applied to the church, and they
have got it to themselves; from whence they call themselves the
clergy, that is, the inheritance or heritage of God. Whereas Peter
exhorts the ministers of the gospel, "Not to be lords over God's
heritage, nor to feed them for filthy lucre." (1 Peter, v. 2,
3.) Peter belike, foresaw pride and avarice to be the ministers'
temptations; and indeed they have often proved their fall: and to
say true, they could hardly fall by worse. Nor is there any excuse
to be made for them in these two respects, which is not worse than
their sin. For if they have not been lords over God's heritage, it
is because they have made themselves that heritage, and disinherited
the people: so that now they may be the people's lords, with a
_salvo_ to good old Peter's exhortation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account