No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of ChristPenn, William
Religion
No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of Christ
Penn, William
Christian life; Christian life -- Quaker authors; Self-denial -- Early works to 1800
shall acknowledge to you that such comedies and tragedies as these
may be serviceable; but then for shame abuse not the name of Jesus
Christ so impudently as to call yourselves Christians, whose lusts
are so strong, that you are forced to use the low shifts of heathens
to repel them: to leave their evils not for the love of virtue, but
out of fear, shame, or reputation. Is this your love to Jesus, your
reverence to the Scriptures, that through faith are able to make the
man of God perfect? Is all your prattle about ordinances, prayers,
sacraments, Christianity, and the like, come to this; that at last
you must betake yourselves to such instructors as were by the sober
heathens permitted to reclaim the most vicious of the people that
were amongst them? And such remedies too as below which there is
nothing but corporal punishment?
VIII. This is so far from Christianity, that many of the nobler
heathens, men and women, were better taught, and better disposed;
they found out more heavenly contemplations, and subjects of an
eternal nature to meditate upon. Nay, so far did they outstrip
the Christians of these times, that they not only were exemplary
by their grave and sober conversation; but for their public
benefit the Athenians instituted the Gynæcosmi, or twenty men,
who should make it their business to observe the people's apparel
and behaviour; that if any were found immodest, and to demean
themselves loosely, they had full authority to punish them. But
the case is altered; it is punishable to reprove such: yes, it is
matter of the greatest contumely and reproach. Nay, so impudent
are some grown in their impieties, that they sport themselves with
such religious persons: and not only manifest a great neglect of
piety, and a severe life by their own looseness, but their extreme
contempt of it, by rendering it ridiculous, through comical and
abusive jests on public stages. Which, how dangerous it is, and apt
to make religion little worth in the people's eyes, besides the
demonstration of this age, let us remember that Aristophanes had not
a readier way to bring the reputation of Socrates in question with
the people, who greatly reverenced him for his grave and virtuous
life and doctrine, than by his abusive representations of him in
a play: which made the airy, wanton, unstable crowd, rather part
with Socrates in earnest, than Socrates in jest. Nor can a better
reason be given why the poor Quakers are made so much the scorn of
men, than because of their severe reprehensions of sin and vanity,
and their self-denying conversation, amidst so great intemperance
in all worldly satisfactions: yet can such libertines all this
while strut and swell for Christians, and strut it out against
precept and example; but we must be whimsical, conceited, morose,
melancholy, or else heretics, deceivers, and what not? O blindness!
Pharisaical hypocrisy! As if such were fit to be judges of religion;
or that it were possible for them to have a sight and sense of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account