No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of ChristPenn, William
Religion
No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of Christ
Penn, William
Christian life; Christian life -- Quaker authors; Self-denial -- Early works to 1800
my lord Cicero, are not to be read in any of the Greek or Latin
stories, and yet they were some of the sages and heroes of those
great empires. No, their own names were enough to distinguish them
from other men, and their virtue and employments in the public
service were their titles of honour. Nor has this vanity yet crept
far into the Latin writers, where it is familiar for authors to cite
the most learned and the most noble, without any addition to their
names, unless worthy or learned: and if their works give it them, we
make no conscience to deny it them. For instance; the Fathers they
only cite thus: Polycarpus, Ignatius, Irenæus, Cyprian, Tertullian,
Origen, Arnobius, Lactantius, Chrysostom, Jerom, &c. More modern
writers; Damascen, Rabanus, Paschasius, Theophylact, Bernard, &c.
And of the last age, Luther, Melancthon, Calvin, Beza, Zuinglius,
Marlorat, Vossius, Grotius, Dalleus, Amyralldus, &c. And of our own
country, Gildas, Beda, Alcuinus, Horn, Bracton, Grosteed, Littleton,
Cranmer, Ridley, Jewel, Whitaker, Seldon, &c. And yet I presume this
will not be thought uncivil or rude. Why then is our simplicity (and
so honestly grounded too, as conscience against pride in man, that
so evilly and perniciously loves and seeks worship and greatness) so
much despised and abused, and that by professed Christians too, who
take themselves to be the followers of Him, that has forbidden these
foolish customs, as plainly as any other impiety condemned in his
doctrine? I earnestly beg the lovers, users, and expecters of these
ceremonies, to let this I have written have some consideration and
weight with them.
XXXVI. However, Christians are not so ill-bred as the world think;
for they show respect too: but the difference between them lies in
the nature of the respect they perform, and the reasons of it. The
world's respect is an empty ceremony, no soul nor substance in it:
the Christian's is a solid thing, whether by obedience to superiors,
love to equals, or help and countenance to inferiors. Next, their
reasons and motives to honour and respect, are as wide one from
the other: for fine apparel, empty titles, or large revenues are
the world's motives, being things her children worship: but the
Christian's motives are the sense of his duty in God's sight; first
to parents and magistrates; and then to inferior relations: and
lastly to all people, according to their virtue, wisdom, and piety;
which is far from respect to the mere persons of men, or having
their persons in admiration for reward: much less on such mean and
base motives as wealth and sumptuous raiment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account