No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of ChristPenn, William
Religion
No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of Christ
Penn, William
Christian life; Christian life -- Quaker authors; Self-denial -- Early works to 1800
IX. But our last reason is of most weight with me, and because
_argumentum ad hominem_, it is most heavy with our despisers, which
is this: it should not therefore be urged upon us, because it is a
most extravagant piece of pride in a mortal man to require or expect
from his fellow-creature a more civil speech or grateful language,
than he is wont to give to the immortal God and his Creator in all
his worship to him. Art thou, O man, greater than he that made thee?
Canst thou approach the God of thy breath and great Judge of thy
life with _thou_ and _thee_, and when thou risest off thy knees,
scorn a Christian for giving to thee, poor mushroom of the earth,
no better language than thou hast given to God but just before? An
arrogancy not to be easily equalled! But again, it has either too
much or too little respect; if too much, do not reproach and be
angry, but gravely and humbly refuse it; if too little, why dost
thou show to God no more? O whither is man gone! To what a pitch
does he soar! He would be used more civilly by us than he uses God;
which is to have us make more than a God of him: but he shall want
worshippers of us, as well as he wants the divinity in himself
that deserves to be worshipped. Certain we are, that the Spirit
of God seeks not these respects, much less pleads for them, or
would be wroth with any that conscientiously refuse to give them.
But that this vain generation is guilty of using them, to gratify
a vain mind, is too palpable. What capping, what cringing, what
scraping, what vain, unmeant words, most hyperbolical expressions,
compliments, gross flatteries, and plain lies, under the name of
civilities, are men and women guilty of in conversation! Ah! my
friends! whence fetch you these examples? What part of all the
writings of the holy men of God warrants these things? But, to
come nearer to your own profession, is Christ your example herein,
whose name you pretend to bear; or those saints of old that lived
in desolate places, of whom the world was not worthy: (Heb. xi.
38:) or do you think you follow the practice of those Christians
that, in obedience to their Master's life and doctrine, forsook the
respect of persons, and relinquished the fashions, honour, and glory
of this transitory world; whose qualifications lay not in external
gestures, respects, and compliments, but in a meek and quiet spirit,
(1 Pet. iii. 4,) adorned with temperance, virtue, modesty, gravity,
patience, and brotherly kindness; which were the tokens of true
honour, and only badges of respect and nobility in those Christian
times? O no. But is it not to expose ourselves both to your contempt
and fury, that we imitate them, and not you? And tell us, pray, are
not romances, plays, masks, gaming, fiddlers, &c. the entertainments
that most delight you? Had you the spirit of Christianity indeed,
could you consume your most precious little time in so many
unnecessary visits, games, and pastimes; in your vain compliments,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account