Great Britain -- History -- Charles I, 1625-1649 -- Fiction
Where the routes ran over hills, the causeway, sunk below the level of
the adjacent land, was more like the bed of a dry watercourse than a
highway of travel; this due to the wear of hoof and washing away by
rains. There was no Macadam then to keep the surface to its normal
height by a compensating stratum of stone; and in many places the
tallest horseman, on the back of a sixteen-hands horse would see a cliff
on either side of him, its crest barely touchable with the stock of his
whip. Often half a mile or more of this ravine-like road would be
encountered, so narrow that vehicles meeting upon it could not by any
possibility pass each other; one of them must needs back again, perhaps,
hundreds of yards! To avoid such _contretemps_, the husbandman who had
occasion to carry corn to the mill, or produce to the market town, in
his huge lumbering wain, was compelled by law to announce its approach
by a jangle of big bells, or the blowing of a horn!
Yet over these ancient highways--many of them still in existence--the
Roman legionaries of Ostorius Scapula had borne their victorious eagles;
and along them many a Silurian warrior, standing erect in his
scythe-winged chariot, was carried to conquest or defeat.
At a later period had they echoed the tramp of armed men, when Henry the
Fourth, father of Agincourt's hero, made war upon the Welsh. Later
still, twice again, in the days of the gallant Llewellyn and those of
the bold Glendower; and still farther down the stream of time were they
stained with blood as of brother shed by brother, when England's
people--those of Wales as well--King-mad and King-cursed, took a fancy,
or frenzy, to cut one another's throats about the colour of a rose.
And now, on these same roads, two centuries later, they were again
engaged in a fratricidal strife, though not as before with both sides
infatuated through kingcraft. One was fighting for a better cause--the
best of all--a people's freedom. The first time they had struck blow
for this or themselves; their stand for Magna Charta, so much vaunted,
being a mere settling of disputes between barons and king; no quarrel of
theirs, nor its results much gain to them. Neither would it be far from
the truth to say, it was the _last_ time for them to draw sword on the
side of human liberty; indeed difficult to point out any war in which
Great Britain has been engaged since not undertaken for the propping up
of vile despotisms, or for selfish purposes equally vile, to the very
latest of them--Zululand and Afghanistan _videlicet_.
But the rebellion against Charles Stuart had a far different aim, all
who upheld it being actuated by higher and nobler motives; and, though
the war was internecine, it need never be regretted. For on the part of
England's people it brought out many a display of courage, devotion to
virtue, and other good qualities, of which any people might be proud.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account