Great Britain -- History -- Charles I, 1625-1649 -- Fiction
Looking at the allegiance of the respective shires to the two parties
that divided the nation, one cannot help observing the wonderful
similitude of their sentiments then as now--almost a parallelism. In
those centres where the cavaliers or malignants held sway, their modern
representatives--Tories and Jingoes--are still in the ascendant. With
some changes and exceptions, true; places which have themselves changed
by increase in population, wealth, refinement, and enlightenment--in
short, all the adjuncts of civilisation. And in all these, or nearly
all, the altered political sentiment has been from the bad to the
better, from the low belief in Divine rights and royal prerogatives to a
higher faith in the rights of the people, if not its highest and purest
form--Republicanism.
From this standard rather has there been retrogression since that
glorious decade when it was the Government of England. At the
Restoration its spirit, with many of its staunchest upholders, took
flight to a land beyond the Atlantic, there to breathe freely, live a
new life, call into existence and nourish a new nation, ere long
destined to dictate the policy and control the action of every other, in
the civilised world. This "sure as eggs are eggs;" unless the old
leaven of human wickedness--not inherent in man's heart, as shallow
thinkers say, but inherited from an ancestry debased by the rule of
prince and priest--unless the old weeds of this manhood's debasement
spring up again from the old seeds and roots, despite all tramplings
down and teachings to the contrary.
It may be so. The devil is still alive on the earth, busy as ever
misleading and corrupting the sons of men; in many places and countries,
alas! too triumphantly successful, even in that land _outre mer_, over
the Atlantic.
At the breaking out of our so-called, but miscalled, "Great Rebellion,"
in the belt of shires bordering Wales, the Royalists were in the
majority; perhaps not so much in numbers as in strength and authority.
The same with Wales itself; not from any natural belief in, or devotion
to, the thing called "Crown," but because this spirited people were
under the domination of certain powerful and wealthy proprietors of the
Royalist party, who controlled their action, as their political
leanings. Of this Monmouthshire offers an apt illustration, where the
Earl of Worcester, Ragland's lord, held undisputed sway to the remotest
corners of the county.
Still, Wales was not all for the King; and where such influence failed
to be exerted, as in Pembroke and Glamorgan in the south, and some
shires and districts of the north, the natural instincts of the Welsh
prompted them to declare for liberty, as they have lately done at the
polls. From any stigma that may have attached to them in the
seventeenth century they have nobly redeemed themselves in the
nineteenth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account