Non-technical chats on iron and steel, and their application to modern industrySpring, La Verne W. (La Verne Ward)
History
Non-technical chats on iron and steel, and their application to modern industry
Spring, La Verne W. (La Verne Ward)
Iron; Steel
From the above it is seen that all sorts of cast iron can be produced
ranging from the extremely hard, high cementite, white irons with low
silicon content down to the very soft gray irons which result mainly
because of higher silicon content and slower cooling.
The white irons are more or less unstable as is shown by the
decomposition through which the hard, white iron castings become
“malleable” by annealing as was told in Chapter XII which discussed
Malleable Cast Iron.
[Illustration:
No. 31. GRAY CAST IRON WITH FERRITE, PEARLITE AND GRAPHITE FLAKES
(_Magnification 70 Diameters_)
]
The gray cast irons are much more stable. They consist of what, in an
early chapter, we referred to as “steels with an impurity, the graphite
flakes.” They consist, then, of free, soft iron or ferrite, certain
amounts of the characteristic steel constituent, pearlite, and the soft
graphite flakes.
They arrive at this composition, through breaking down of the austenite
and cementite structures during the cooling,—just how not having been
satisfactorily determined. Consistent study is being put upon this
subject and several unique and long-studied possible explanations of
this section of the full equilibrium diagram have been proposed and
debated, all based upon the data so far available. While much
information on this subject has been gained the matter is still so much
in dispute that it is best for us to venture nothing definite in regard
to just how the changes occur. The reference books for this chapter (see
page 354) give quite completely the data, theories and explanations so
far available.
Compared with the steels, the cast irons are vastly complicated. In them
we have elements which occur in practically negligible amounts in the
steels. Commercial cast irons, for instance, have silicon ranging
anywhere from ½% to 3%, phosphorus .10% to 2%, graphite 0% to 3.50%, and
carbon in the combined form (pearlite or cementite) from 3.50% to .10%.
If these represent the majority of cast irons what about our pig irons
which have 2, 5, 8, 10 or even 15% of silicon, others with 1 or 2 and
occasionally very much more of manganese, and still others which vary
widely in phosphorus content?—for from the metallographic and physical
chemistry standpoint pig irons are cast irons.
As we can never get perfectly pure iron-carbon alloys to experiment
with, their content of other elements, silicon, nickel, phosphorus,
etc., vitiate more or less the results obtained, but even could such
pure alloys be secured we are not greatly helped since our serviceable
alloys are never such. Each added element brings about greater
complication and one does not wonder that in the short twenty years
which have elapsed since study was seriously undertaken, metallurgical
science has not entirely solved the big problem.
REFERENCES
GENERAL & VARIOUS
“The A B C of Iron and Steel,” Penton Publishing Co., Cleveland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account