Non-technical chats on iron and steel, and their application to modern industrySpring, La Verne W. (La Verne Ward)
History
Non-technical chats on iron and steel, and their application to modern industry
Spring, La Verne W. (La Verne Ward)
Iron; Steel
However, during the melting down of the charge the steel scrap becomes
molten and its constituents merge with those of the other iron materials
charged. We get out of the cupola, then, a mixture which, disregarding
the losses and gains due to the air of the blast, the fuel, etc., is an
average of the materials charged. We, therefore, no longer have any
steel, but a cast iron which has a somewhat lower silicon, phosphorus
and carbon than the softer cast irons. The greater strength of the alloy
is due to its composition and only indirectly to the fact that steel was
used in its production. The physical properties of the steel charged
have been entirely obliterated in the melting process.
[Illustration:
SPLIT PATTERN OF WOOD, SURFACE-COATED WITH SHELLAC VARNISH
]
This view that semi-steel only indirectly gets its increase in strength
from the steel charged is confirmed by its structural appearance under
the microscope, as was shown in numbers 74 and 92d which were given on
page 79, and the photomicrographs given here, and by its extreme
brittleness under hammer blows. Under such shock it is but little more
resistant than cast iron.
[Illustration:
CORE THAT MAKES HOLE IN CASTING
]
This weakness under “shock” was shown by tests from which the table
which follows was compiled. Bars one inch square and thirteen inches
long laid on supports exactly twelve inches apart, were struck at the
center by a twenty-five pound weight. It took seven blows to break the
cast iron bar, the semi-steel bar required eleven, while cast steel
withstood ninety-two blows. Even this does not adequately express the
great resistance of the cast steel (another alloy not yet discussed),
for the height of the “drop” was being increased one inch with every
blow, and the cast steel bar, on account of its bending, had to be
regularly turned. The total foot-pounds exerted by the blows are given
in the table which follows:
[Illustration:
DRAG, OR BOTTOM HALF OF MOLD, AFTER PATTERN IS WITHDRAWN
]
[Illustration:
DRAG WITH CORE IN PLACE AND COPE, OR TOP HALF OF MOLD READY TO CLOSE
]
[Illustration:
TRANSPARENT MOLD, SHOWING RELATIVE POSITIONS OF CORE, CASTING, SPRUE,
ETC.
]
══════════════════════╤════════╤══════╤══════
Alloy │Tensile │Number│Total
│Strength│ of │ Foot
│ │Blows │Pounds
──────────────────────┼────────┼──────┼──────
Cast Iron │ 23,400│ 7│ 102
Semi-Steel │ 35,050│ 11│ 206
Malleable Cast Iron[8]│ 37,140│ 22│ 1,580
Cast Steel[8] │ 72,120│ 92│10,112
──────────────────────┴────────┴──────┴──────
Footnote 8:
On account of bending, the malleable iron and the steel bars had to be
turned several times.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account