Norfolk Annals, Vol. 1: A Chronological Record of Remarkable Events in the Nineteeth CenturyMackie, Charles
History
Norfolk Annals, Vol. 1: A Chronological Record of Remarkable Events in the Nineteeth Century
Mackie, Charles
Norfolk (England) -- History
5.—At a meeting of the Norwich Court of Guardians, a report was adopted
in favour of altering the mulcts of the assessable property in each of
the parishes and hamlets of the city. In the parishes the old valuation
was £61,302; the new, £89,080; increase, £27,778—45 per cent. In the
hamlets the old valuation was £19,722; the new, £21,487; increase,
£1,765—about 9 per cent. At the vestry meetings in several parishes the
new assessment was rejected—(1) on the ground of increased local and
public burdens to which the citizens would be exposed by increased rent
on such valuation; and (2) because of the disproportion of the assessment
of the hamlets as compared with the assessment of the city at large. At
a meeting of the Guardians on April 1st, a resolution was adopted
declaring the mulct to be unequal, and advising that steps be taken to
place it upon a fair and equitable basis.
8.—A “trial of speed” took place between the Westacre and Melton
Constable hounds. “A noble stag stood before the hounds an hour and ten
minutes, but from the numerous field, amounting at least to 400, the
greater part of whom were shamefully riding the roads and heading the
stag at every point, the sport was not brilliant. Through the greater
part of the day the Westacre hounds took the lead, carried the best head,
and did all the work; but from the jockeyship of Sir Jacob Astley’s
huntsman in continually lifting his hounds, and numerous horsemen
pressing on them in the lanes and woods, so completely frightened the
Westacre hounds, which are more timid and less accustomed to such crowds
than the Melton, that most of them were thrown out and could not again
recover their ground.” The match took place in the neighbourhood of East
Dereham.
12.—In the Court of King’s Bench, Sir James Scarlett moved for a rule to
show cause why a _quo warranto_ information should not be filed against
Mr. Angell, of Norwich, for exercising the office of alderman without
being properly elected thereto. “A very ancient custom,” he said,
“prevailed at Norwich on the election of aldermen, which he was sure
would not, from its antiquity, receive their lordships’ sanction. It was
called the cooping of voters, and consisted of taking the voters by force
in a body, bribing them, giving them drink, and keeping them locked up
until they consented to vote for the party on whose side they had been
taken.” It was alleged that several of the supporters of Mr. Angell’s
opponent (Mr. Marshall) were waylaid, carried away by force in a coach,
put on board a boat on the broads, and had persons placed over them as
guards. If these persons had had their liberty, Mr. Marshall, it was
contended, would have been elected. Lord Tenterden granted a rule to
show cause. It was abandoned, however, on April 28th, and “the bells of
St. Peter rang a triumphant peal on the result being known.”
13.—A squadron of the 6th Dragoons arrived at Norwich Barracks, to
replace the depôt of the 12th Lancers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account