Northern Nut Growers Association, Report of the Proceedings at the Seventh Annual Meeting: Washington, D. C. September 8 and 9, 1916.
Science
Northern Nut Growers Association, Report of the Proceedings at the Seventh Annual Meeting: Washington, D. C. September 8 and 9, 1916.
Northern Nut Growers Association -- Periodicals; Nut trees -- Periodicals; Nuts -- Periodicals
THE PRESIDENT: I am going to take the liberty of emphasizing one point
the Colonel made. He told you about the great number of things they knew
down South that were not so. I wish to give some geographical spread to
his generalities. We are in the same condition in the North. If you will
stop and look clear through an agricultural idea, you will be
astonished, ladies and gentlemen, absolutely astonished, to see how,
mostly, we don't know it. The other day I happened to be walking through
an apple orchard with the official horticulturist, and in response to
some remark he made I asked: "Do you know that, or do you think it?"
"Has that been experimentally proven?" He answered: "No, it has not."
Most of the things we read in the books and hear in this place and other
places we don't know. We think we know, but when we come to a show-down
we really haven't got experimental data. I know of no people to whom
that thing needs to be emphasized more than to the Northern Nut Growers'
Association.
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 9TH, AT 10.30 A. M.
Meeting called to order by the President.
THE PRESIDENT: The first order of business, I believe, will be the
report of the Nominating Committee.
THE SECRETARY: The report of the Nominating Committee is the following:
For President, W. C. Reed, Vincennes, Indiana; Vice-President, W. N.
Hutt, Raleigh, North Carolina; Secretary-Treasurer, Dr. W. C. Deming,
Georgetown, Connecticut.
MR. LITTLEPAGE: Mr. President, I move that the report of this Nominating
Committee be accepted and adopted, and these officers declared elected.
THE PRESIDENT: Do I hear a second?
A MEMBER: Second the motion.
THE PRESIDENT: The nomination of this list is moved and seconded. Is
there any discussion? If not, all those in favor will say "aye;"
opposed, like sign, it is carried, and they are elected.
MR. LITTLEPAGE: While I am on the floor, I want to read a resolution
which I have drafted, and I will read the clauses separately:
"Owing to the fatal character, the unchecked and rapid spread of the
chestnut blight," is there any question about that? If that is not true,
let somebody hold up his hand.
"Owing to the fact that it has been widely disseminated through the
shipment of nursery stock;" is that correct?
"Owing to the fact that in the first stages the disease cannot be easily
detected;" is that true?
"Owing to the fact that the young trees apparently have a temporary
immunity from the disease;"
"Therefore, the Northern Nut Growers' Association believes that the
continued free shipment of chestnut nursery stock will be productive of
endless destruction of property in those places where the chestnut trees
haven't yet the disease." If that is unsound, why, somebody say so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account