4. Time might have given admission to behaviour on his part, of a sort, by which distrust might be lessened, confidence strengthened. Well; now we have him at Jerusalem,--and for the first time after his conversion. When thus, at Jerusalem,--of those whom he went to see, whom did he actually see? Answer, Peter for one; James, whom he styles the Lord's brother, and who, according to him, though not literally a brother, was, however, a kinsman of Jesus:--these two, according to his own shewing; these two, and no more. "Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. But of the other Apostles saw I none, save James, the Lord's brother." Gal. 1:18, 19. SECTION 4. OCCASION, AS PER ACTS ACCOUNT COMPARED WITH PAUL'S. Such as hath been seen is Paul's account of the matter:--Paul's own account, of the interval that elapsed, between his conversion, and the first of his subsequent visits to Jerusalem:--to the residence of the Christians, whom he had been persecuting, and of the rulers, under and by the authority of whom, the persecution had been carried on. Such, loose as it is, is his account, of the interval between these two events: and of the place, in which, either almost the whole, or at any rate the greatest part of it, was passed. Such was Paul's own account of his own proceedings,--at the distance of twenty-five years and more. Compare with it, now, the account, given by his historiographer--given, of the interval, that, according to him, had place, between these same two events. Acts 9:19-29. Here, no three years' sojournment in Arabia: no visit to that country: no notice, of any place, other than Damascus, as being a place, in which the whole, or any part, of the time in question, was passed. In a position, with respect to each other, scarcely different from that of contiguity,--are the two events brought together. The blood of their disciples scarce washed from off his hands, when, with Barnabas for his introducer, he presents himself to the Apostles! At the very time, when the Jerusalem rulers, would have been expecting to receive from him, the proofs of his punctuality, in the execution of the important plan, of official oppression, of which, at his own instance, he had been solemnly constituted and appointed the instrument; when, after going over to and forming a league with the criminals, for such they must have been called, whom he had been commissioned by these rulers to bring to justice;--at this very time it is, that he returns to the seat of their dominion:--to the place in which, at that very time, his return to them, with the intended victims in captivity, could not but be the subject of universal expectation! Let any one now judge, whether, in any state of things, natural or supernatural, the sort of conduct thus supposed is credible.