Thus much for this third visit of Paul's to Jerusalem, reckoning from the time of his conversion: thus much for this third visit, and the partition-treaty that was the result of it. In and by his fourth visit to that original metropolis of the Christian world,--we shall see how this same treaty was violated--violated, without any the slightest reason or pretext, or so much as an attempt, on the part of his anonymous biographer,--either by his own mouth, or by that of his hero,--to assign a motive. Violated--that is to say, by and on the part of Paul: for, of Peter, no further mention is, in all this history, to be found. The truth is--that, instead of "the Acts of the Apostles," the History of Paul--namely, from the time of his conversion to the time of his arrival at Rome--would have been the more proper denomination of it. Of any other of the Apostles, and their acts,--little, if anything, more is said, than what is just sufficient, to prepare the reader, for the history of Paul, by bringing to view the state of the Christian world, at the time of his coming upon the stage. As to Saint Peter,--the author's chief hero being all along Saint Paul, in whose train, during this last-mentioned of his excursions, he represents himself as being established,--what is said of Saint Peter and his achievements, stands, as it were, but as an episode. And though, by this historiographer, no mention is made of the _partition-treaty_, it has eventually been of use to us, by serving to show what, at the time of entering into that engagement, was the situation of St. Peter; and how good the title is, which the transaction presents to our credence,--as being so natural, because so manifestly for the advantage of both the contracting parties, as well as of the religion of Jesus, in so far as that of Paul was conformable to it. SECTION 3. TIME OF THE PARTITION TREATY, MOST PROBABLY THAT OF VISIT I. The time, at which this partition-treaty took place, appears involved in much obscurity, and presents some difficulties: question--whether it was at the first, or not till the third, of these visits--of these four visits of Paul's to Jerusalem. The consideration, by which the assigning to it the time of the first visit has been determined, is--that it was at this first visit, that the demand for it, in respect of all interests concerned, namely, that of the religion of Jesus--that of the existing Christians in general,--as well as that of the individuals particularly concerned on both sides,--took place: that, from that time, so, as far as appears, did the observance of it: and that it was not till a long time after, that either symptoms, or complaints of non-observance, seem to have made their appearance.