Notes and Letters on the Natural History of Norfolk: More Especially on the Birds and FishesBrowne, Thomas, Sir
History
Notes and Letters on the Natural History of Norfolk: More Especially on the Birds and Fishes
Browne, Thomas, Sir
Natural history -- England -- Norfolk
haue you putt in the musca Tulipar[=u] muscata[108]
[108] It seems impossible to identify this insect; _Merodon
narcissi_ has been suggested, but Mr. Verrall, whom I consulted
says, "certainly not _Merodon_, which probably was not known in
Britain until about 1870," and suggests the small fly _Nemopoda_.
Mr. Bloomfield writes that the only fly of which he has seen any
mention as having a musky or "excellent fragrant odour" is _Sepsis
cynipsea_, which Kirby and Spence state on the authority of De
Geer, "emits a fragrant odour of beaum" (balm); this species is
very nearly allied to Nemopoda. Several Bees, for instance the
Genus _Prosopis_, emit a strong scent of balm, and it is possible
that Browne may have used the term "fly" in what is even now a
popular sense, and that really some species of Bee may have called
forth his remarks. It will be noticed that at p. 74 he speaks of it
as a "small beelike flye."
That bird which I sayd much answered the discription of Garrulus
Argentoratensis [_see Note 49_] I send you it was shott on a tree x
miles of 4 yeares ago. it may well bee called the Parret Jay or Garrulus
psittacoides speciosus. the colours are much faded. if you haue it
before I should bee content to haue it agayne otherwise you may please
to keep it.
Garrulus Bohemicus[109] probably you haue a prettie handsome bird with
the fine cinnaberin tipps of the wings some wch I haue seen heere haue
the tayle tipt with yellowe wch is not in the discription.
[109] Mr. Stevenson, whom very little relating to Norfolk
Ornithology escaped, was well acquainted with Sir Thomas Browne's
works, yet has in his "Birds of Norfolk" unaccountably overlooked
this passage, and remarks that Browne does not appear to have
noticed this species; he however not only refers to it as above,
but evidently describes it from his personal observation. It is a
very uncertain winter visitor to this county, but on rare occasions
makes its appearance in considerable flocks. A remarkable instance
of this occurred in the winter of 1866-7, when Mr. Stevenson, as
the result of the examination of a very large series, contributed
an exhaustive paper on the plumage of this handsome bird to the
"Transactions of the Norf. and Nor. Nat. Soc.," iii., pp. 326-344.
I haue also sent you urtica mas [_see Note 105_] which I lately gathered
at Golston by yarmouth where I found it to growe also 25 yeares ago. of
the stella marina Testacea which I sent you [_see Note 87_] I do not
find the figure in any booke.
I send you a few flies[110] which some unhealthful yeares about the
first part of september I haue obserued so numerous upon plashes in the
marshes & marish diches that in a small compasse it were no hard matter
to gather a peck of them I brought some what my box would hold butt the
greatest part are scatterd lost or giuen away for memorie sake I writ on
my box muscæ palustres Autumnales [See Appendix D.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account