Notes and Letters on the Natural History of Norfolk: More Especially on the Birds and FishesBrowne, Thomas, Sir
History
Notes and Letters on the Natural History of Norfolk: More Especially on the Birds and Fishes
Browne, Thomas, Sir
Natural history -- England -- Norfolk
Fulica and cotta Anglorum [_see Note 23_] are different birds though
good resemblance between them, so some doubt may bee made whether it bee
to bee made a coote except you set it downe fulica nostras. & cotta
Anglorum I pray consider whether that waterbird whose draught I sent in
the last box & thought it might bee named Anatula or mergulus
melanoleucos may not bee some gallinula. it hath some resemblance with
gallina hypoleucos of Johnst Tab 32 [31] butt myne hath shorter wings by
much & the bill not so long [_Fol. 198 verso_] & slender & shorter leggs
& lesser & so may ether be calld gallina Aquatica hypoleucos nostras or
hypoleucos or melanoleucos Anatula or mergulus nostras.[119]
[119] The "draught" of this bird sent to Merrett is not
forthcoming. Professor Newton has been kind enough to send me the
following note on this puzzling passage. "Jonston's figure (tab.
31) of _Gallina hypoleucos_, to which Browne says it bore some
resemblance, undoubtedly represents what we know as the Common
Sandpiper, _Totanus hypoleucus_ or _Actitis hypoleuca_, the
_Fysterlin_ of the Germans of Jonston's time (p. 160), and
_Fisterlein_ or _Pfisterlein_ of modern days. But there seems to be
some strange confusion that cannot now be cleared, between this
bird and Browne's _Anatula_ or _Mergulus melanoleucos_ [_see_ p. 76
_ante_], of which some years later, he sent a drawing, under the
latter name, to Willughby, in whose work it is described and
figured (Lat. Ed. p. 261, Engl. 343, tab. lix.), for this most
certainly is the Rotche or Little Auk, _Mergulus alle_ of modern
ornithology." In the next letter (p. 81), Browne mentions that he
encloses the draft of "Ralla aquatica" here referred to.
Tis much there should be no Icon of Rallus or Ralla Aquatica I haue a
draught of one & they are found among us
Feb xii 1668.
The vesicaria I sent is like that you mention [_see Note 91_] if not the
same the co[=m]on fanago resembleth the husk of peas this of [Part
_crossed out_] Barly when the flower is mouldred away. [See also p. 89
_infra_, where Merrett aptly compares the latter to the flowers of the
Grape Hyacinth.]
No. VII.
[BIBLIOTHECA BODLEIANA. MS. RAWLINSON D. cviii. SR THO BROWN TO DR.
MERRETT.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account