THE TIPPET.--This is a piece of cloth about two feet long, shaped
something like a gun-case; it is worn by the Judges in the Crown
Court, and by the Serjeants in term time, hung from the right shoulder
by a strong metal hook. The tippet is mentioned as a portion of
ecclesiastical costume in the 74th canon of 1603. In a very interesting
article, which recently appeared in the "Quarterly Review," entitled
"Rubric against Usage," some question is raised as to what the tippet
was, but on this there ought to be no doubt, as it is still worn by the
Judges and Serjeants-at-Law.
THE BLACK SILK SCARF.--This is worn by the Judge in the Crown Court; it
is the same as the scarf worn by the clergy, and is evidently derived
from the stola, an ecclesiastical vestment.
THE BLACK SILK GIRDLE.--This is worn by the Judge in the Crown Court;
it was a part of the civil costume of the reign of King Henry VII, and
is often seen represented in monumental brasses of that period.
THE HOOD.--Judges sometimes wear the ermine hood with their scarlet
robes. The barrister has a black hood (useless from its small size)
attached to the back of his gown.
THE JUDGE'S COURT HAT.--An equilateral cocked hat. The gentleman's hat
_temp._ George II.
THE BLACK COAT AND WAISTCOAT.--The bar did not uniformly wear these
till after the general mourning for Queen Anne. Before this time the
barristers wore coats and waistcoats of any colour under their gowns,
as the undergraduates of Oxford do now. But at this general mourning
the Judges thought that the bar in the uniform black dress looked so
well that they suggested its continuance, and it has been continued
ever since. Indeed, it seems to be pretty clear that a black waistcoat
was not always a part of the costume of the bar, as even now, on
full dress occasions, the Queen's Counsel wear waistcoats of gold or
silver tissue, or of white silk embroidered with coloured flowers.
On ecclesiastical and forensic costume in general the Rev. Dr. Burn
(before cited) observes that "most of the peculiar habits, both in the
Church and in Courts of Justice, and in the Universities, were in their
day the common habit of the nation, and were retained by persons and in
places of importance only as having an air of antiquity, and thereby in
some sort conducing to attract veneration, and the same, on the other
hand, in proportion do persuade to a suitable gravity of demeanour, for
an irreverent behaviour in a venerable habit is extremely burlesque and
ungraceful."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account