Large quantities of salt were from time to time lost in the Severn, as
the vessels laden with that commodity were making their way down the
river from Worcester, owing to strong tides and violent winds; and the
rolls record frequent applications to the Court "for certificates to
entitle them (the owners) to such allowance as the act of Parliament
permits." These allowances were no doubt the return of a part or the
whole of the very heavy duty then levied on salt.
By the 21st George III, chap. 58, and 26th George III, chap. 43,
certain bounties were offered for the cultivation of hemp and flax.
Nevertheless, England has never grown a sufficient quantity for its
own consumption, farmers not regarding it with favour, owing to the
supposed exhaustive nature of the crop. In Worcestershire, for 1782
and some following years, claims were made (and allowed by Quarter
Sessions) for these bounties, by--
Jos. Cooper the elder } All Saints, Evesham
Jos. Cooper the younger }
(grown by them at Bretforton, Great Hampton, Fladbury,
Pershore, Honeybourne, Cropthorne, and the Littletons).
John Taylor of Bromsgrove.
Henry Ellins of Stoke Prior, at Rushock, Doverdale, Bromsgrove,
Stoke, and Hanbury.
Thomas Brooks, Droitwich, at Doverdale.
John Tolley of Stoke, at Tardebigg and Hanbury.
Jos. Rose, Bromsgrove.
George Dunklin, ditto.
William Moore, Tardebigg.
Jos. Downing, Bromsgrove.
James Andrews, Pershore.
John Corbyn, Tardebigg.
James Heynes, Alvechurch.
William Shepherd, ditto.
Eliz. Eaves, ditto.
Edw. Pearkes, ditto.
Thomas Overton, Tardebigg.
Jos. Duffill, Bromsgrove.
H. D. Humphries, ditto.
Jos. Rose, ditto.
William Hutchins, Wick, Pershore.
John Tolley, Stoke.
Clement Nash, Stoke.
William Tay, Kingsnorton.
Jos. Everill, Tenbury.
Jos. Downing, Belbroughton.
Thomas Brookes, Droitwich.
From 1787 to 1792 the Worcestershire claims for flax bounty amounted to
£79. 8s. 10d., and these were allowed.
Tobacco also was an article of which the Court of Quarter Sessions took
cognisance, and some interesting particulars relative to the growth and
suppression of "the weed" in Worcestershire will be found in another
part of this work.
In the year 1670 the grand jury presented Henry Sandalls, bailiff of
Bewdley, "who hath toll of the market, for upholding unjust measures;"
Elias Arch, bailiff of Kidderminster, ditto; Thomas Foley, Esq., "who
receives the benefit of the toll of Stourbridge, for not providing a
brass measure according to act of Parliament, and for not making the
measures of the town according to the same; and that the justices
do take into consideration the great abuse that the people of this
county which resort to this city of Worcester to market do receive
by unjustness of the measures, and by the jogging and shaking of the
same;" and suggesting various rewards for the capture of several known
offenders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account