How different must those men have been from the soft and effeminate
Hindoo who has forgotten in the mist of ages these shrines of his
fathers, and abandoned them to ruin and decay; and who, conscious of his
own utter inability to achieve or conceive their equals, ascribes their
formation to giants and demigods. And they were different. The same
race, but different men, different in features as in minds. While the
profile of the modern Hindoo is soft and effeminate, and the Nose short
and rounded (parabolic), the ancient sculptures demonstrate that the
profile of their earliest progenitors was manly and decided, and
identical with that of their descendants, the Indo-Germanic nations, in
Europe. One well-known instance will suffice. The Trimurti or
three-headed deity in the caves of Elephanta.
This is a sculpture of the most remote antiquity, but the dress, the
beads, the sacred cord and other religious symbols declare it to be the
work of Hindoos. In anthropomorphising the Deity, men always adopt their
own typical countenance for that of their God. Hence their idols betray
the national features. Now, observe the profiles of Vishnu and Siva in
this Trimurti. The face of the former, the good and beneficent
“Preserver,” the friend and mediator for man, is a purely Greek face;
the Nose straight and well-defined. It has none of the air of the modern
Hindoo countenance. Much less has that of the energetic and terrible
Siva, “the Destroyer.” The Nose is of the most energetic form; it is a
fine Roman Nose, aquiline and rugose. If phrenologists are permitted
from similar facts to say that the Greeks—who were but children to these
Hindoo artists—were phrenologists, surely we may venture to say that
even at this very early period the Hindoos were Nasologists.
[Illustration:
THE HINDOO TRIMURTI.
]
But in the wide nostril of Brahma we also perceive the Cogitative form
of Nose, so necessary to indicate the wisdom of Brahma, “the Creator:”
who, though now he rests, having consigned the inferior office of
Preservation to Vishnu, was the first emanation from the supreme Brahmè,
and by whom and from whom all creation proceeded. With the exception of
the head in this Trimurti, Brahma has no idolatrous representations, for
it is said in the Vedas, “Of Him whose glory is so great, there is no
image. He is the incomprehensible Being which illumines all, delights
all, and whence all proceed.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account