Notes on the Book of Deuteronomy, Volume IMackintosh, Charles Henry
Religion
Notes on the Book of Deuteronomy, Volume I
Mackintosh, Charles Henry
Bible. Deuteronomy -- Commentaries
[10] It may be that the reader feels a little jealous of any
interference with our excellent English Bible. He may, like many
others, feel disposed to say, "How is an uneducated man to know what
is Scripture and what is not? Must he depend upon scholars and critics
to give him certainty on so grave and important a question? If so, is
it not the same old story of looking to human authority to confirm the
Word of God?" By no means. It is a totally different thing. We all
know that all copies and translations must be, in some points,
imperfect, as being human; but we believe that the same grace which
gave the Word in the original Hebrew and Greek languages, has most
marvelously watched over our English translation, so that a poor man,
at the back of a mountain, may rest assured that he possesses in his
common English Bible the revelation of the mind of God. It is
wonderful, after all the labors of scholars and critics, how few
passages, comparatively, have had to be touched; and not one affecting
any foundation-doctrine of Christianity. God, who graciously gave us
the holy Scriptures at the first, has watched over them and preserved
them to His Church in a most wonderful manner. Moreover, He has seen
fit to make use of the labors of scholars and critics, from age to
age, to clear the sacred text of errors which, through the infirmity
attaching to all human agency, had crept into it. Should these
corrections shake our confidence in the integrity of Scripture as a
whole? or lead us to doubt that we possess, in very deed, the Word of
God? Nay, rather should they lead us to bless God for His goodness in
watching over His Word in order to preserve it in its integrity for
His Church.
But in addition to all that has been advanced in reference to this
question, we cannot but think that the occurrence of the clause, "who
walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit," in verse 4, affords
abundant evidence of its misplacement in verse 1. We cannot, for a
moment, admit the thought of redundancy in holy Scripture. Now, in
verse 4 it _is_ a question of walk--a question of our fulfilling "the
righteousness [mark the word--δικαίωμα] of the law," and
hence the clause is in its right, because divinely fitted, place. A
person who walks in the Spirit--as every Christian ought--fulfills the
righteousness of the law. Love is the fulfilling of the law; and love
will lead us to do what the ten commandments could never effect,
namely, to love our enemies. No lover of holiness, no advocate of
practical righteousness, need ever be the least afraid of losing aught
by abandoning the legal ground, and taking his place on the elevated
platform of true Christianity--by turning from Mount Sinai to Mount
Zion--by passing from Moses to Christ. No; he only reaches a higher
source, a deeper spring, a wider sphere of holiness, righteousness,
and practical obedience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account