Notes on the Book of LeviticusMackintosh, Charles Henry
Religion
Notes on the Book of Leviticus
Mackintosh, Charles Henry
Bible. Leviticus -- Commentaries
"And he shall sprinkle upon him that is to be cleansed from the
leprosy seven times, and shall pronounce him clean, and shall let the
bird loose into the open field." The more deeply we ponder over the
contents of chapter xiii, the more clearly we shall see how utterly
impossible it was for the leper to do aught towards his own cleansing.
All he could do was to "put a covering upon his upper lip;" and all he
could say was, "Unclean, unclean." It belonged to God, and to Him
alone, to devise and accomplish a work whereby the leprosy could be
perfectly cleansed; and further, it belonged to God, and to Him alone,
to pronounce the leper "clean." Hence it is written, "The priest shall
sprinkle," and "he shall pronounce him clean." It is not said, The
leper shall sprinkle and pronounce or imagine himself clean. This
would never do. God was the Judge--God was the Healer--God was the
Cleanser. He alone knew what leprosy was, how it could be put away,
and when to pronounce the leper clean. The leper might have gone on
all his days covered with leprosy, and yet be wholly ignorant of what
was wrong with him. It was the Word of God--the Scriptures of
truth--the divine Record that declared the full truth as to leprosy;
and nothing short of the self-same authority could pronounce the leper
clean, and that, moreover, only on the solid and indisputable ground
of death and resurrection. There is the most precious connection
between the three things in verse 7: the blood is sprinkled, the
leper pronounced clean, and the living bird let loose. There is not so
much as a single syllable about what the leper was to do, to say, to
think, or to feel. It was enough that he was a leper--a fully
revealed, a thoroughly judged leper, covered from head to foot. This
sufficed for him; all the rest pertained to God.
It is of all importance for the anxious inquirer after peace to enter
into the truth unfolded in this branch of our subject. So many are
tried by the question of _feeling_, _realizing_, and _appropriating_,
instead of seeing, as in the leper's case, that the sprinkling of the
blood was as independent and as divine as the shedding of it. It is
not said, The leper shall apply, appropriate, or realize, and then he
shall be clean. By no means. The plan of deliverance was divine; the
provision of the sacrifice was divine; the shedding of the blood was
divine; the sprinkling of the blood was divine; the record as to the
result was divine: in short, it was all divine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account