Notes on the book of NumbersMackintosh, Charles Henry
Religion
Notes on the book of Numbers
Mackintosh, Charles Henry
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
In the first place, where was Israel’s proper portion—their divinely
destined inheritance? Most surely on the other side of Jordan, in the
land of Canaan. Well, then, ought not this fact to have sufficed? Would
or could a really true heart—a heart that thought and felt and judged
with God—have entertained the idea of selecting a portion other than that
which God had allotted and bestowed? Impossible. Hence, then, we need
not to go further in order to have a divine judgment on this subject. It
was a mistake, a failure, a stopping short of the divine mark, on the
part of Reuben and Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh, to choose any
boundary-line short of the river Jordan. They were governed, in their
conduct, by worldly and selfish considerations—by the sight of their
eyes—by carnal motives. They surveyed “the land of Jazer and the land of
Gilead,” and they estimated it entirely according to their own interests,
and without any reference to the judgment and will of God. Had they been
simply looking to God, the question of settling down short of the river
Jordan would never have been raised at all.
But when people are not simple, not true-hearted, they get into
circumstances which give rise to all sorts of questions. It is a great
matter to be enabled, by divine grace, to pursue a line of action, and to
tread a path so unequivocal, as that no question can be raised. It is our
holy and happy privilege so to carry ourselves as that no complication
may ever arise. The secret of so doing is to walk with God, and thus to
have our conduct wholly governed by His Word.
But that Reuben and Gad were not thus governed is manifest from the
entire history. They were half-and-half men; men of mixed principles;
mere borderers; men that sought their own things, and not the things of
God. Had these latter engrossed their hearts, nothing would have induced
them to take up their position short of the true boundary-line.
It is very evident that Moses had no sympathy with their proposal. It
was a judgment upon his conduct that he was not allowed to go over. His
heart was in the promised land, and he longed to go thither in person.
How could he, then, approve of the conduct of men who were not only
prepared, but actually desirous, to take up their abode somewhere else?
Faith can never be satisfied with any thing short of the true position
and portion of God’s people. A single eye can only see, a faithful heart
only desire, the inheritance given of God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account