[99] Theologians took infinite pains to distinguish between
miracles (_miracula_), which could be wrought by divine
power only, and the kind of wonders (_mira_) which Satan
worked. See, for example, William Perkins, A Discourse of
the Damned Art of Witchcraft, 1608, pp. 12 ff., 18 ff.;
Del Rio, Disquisitiones Magicæ, lib. ii, quæstio 7, ed.
1616, pp. 103 ff. Sir Robert Filmer, in An Advertisement
to the Jurymen of England, Touching Witches (appended to
The Free-holders Grand Inquest, 1679; cf. p. 34, note 88,
above), makes merry with such fine-spun distinctions. “Both
[Perkins and Del Rio],” he says, “seem to agree in this,
that he had need be an admirable or profound Philosopher,
that can distinguish between a Wonder and a Miracle; it
would pose _Aristotle_ himself, to tell us every thing that
can be done by the power of Nature, and what things cannot;
for there be daily many things found out, and daily more
may be, which our Fore-fathers never knew to be possible
in Nature” (pp. 322-323). Cf. Calef, More Wonders of the
Invisible World, 1700, p. 35.
[100] Cf. Soldan, Geschichte der Hexenprozesse, ed.
Heppe, II, 243:--“Zu derjenigen freieren Kritik der
biblischen Schriften selbst sich zu erheben, welche
das Vorhandensein gewisser, aus den Begriffen der Zeit
geschöpfter dämonologischen Vorstellungen in der Bibel
anerkennt, ohne daraus eine bindende Norm für den Glauben
herzuleiten,--diese war freilich erst einem späteren
Zeitalter vorbehalten. Bekker kannte, um seine sich ihm
aufdringende philosophische Ueberzeugung mit der Bibel
zu versöhnen, keinen andern Weg, als den der Üblichen
Exegese, und daher kommt es, dass diese nicht überall eine
ungezwungene ist.” It is instructive to note the pains
which Sir Walter Scott takes, in his Second Letter on
Demonology and Witchcraft, to harmonise the Bible with his
views on these subjects.
[101] To avoid all possibility of misapprehension I shall
venture to express my own feelings. The two men who appeal
to me most in the whole affair of witchcraft are Friedrich
Spee, the Jesuit, and Balthasar Bekker, the “intolerable”
pastor of Amsterdam. But what I _feel_, and what all of
us feel, is not to the purpose. There has been too much
feeling in modern discussions of witchcraft already.
[102] Sigmund Riezler, Geschichte der Hexenprozesse in
Bayern, Stuttgart, 1896, p. 143.
[103] Ibid.
[104] Soldan, Geschichte der Hexenprozesse, revised by
Heppe, II, 37; cf. G. L. Burr, The Fate of Dietrich Flade,
1891 (reprinted from the Papers of the American Historical
Association, V).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account