Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
This class of technical terms, namely, words adopted from common
language, but rendered precise and determinate for purposes of
science, may also be exemplified in other sciences. Thus, as was
observed in the early portion of the history of astronomy[1\4], a
_day_, a _month_, a _year_, described at first portions of time
marked by familiar changes, but afterwards portions determined by
rigorous mathematical definitions. The conception of the heavens as
a revolving sphere, is so obvious, {260} that we may consider the
terms which involve this conception as parts of common language; as
the _pole_ (πόλος); the _arctic circle_, which includes the stars
that never set[2\4]; the _horizon_ (ὁρίζων) a boundary, applied
technically to the circle bounding the visible earth and sky. The
_turnings of the sun_ (τροπαὶ ἠελίοιο), which are mentioned by
Hesiod, gave occasion to the term _tropics_, the circles at which
the sun in his annual motion turns back from his northward or
southward advance. The _zones_ of the earth, (the _torrid_,
_temperate_, and _frigid_;) the _gnomon_ of a dial; the _limb_ (or
border) of the moon, or of a circular instrument, are terms of the
same class. An _eclipse_ (ἔκλειψις) is originally a deficiency or
disappearance, and joined with the name of the luminary, an _eclipse
of the sun_ or _of the moon_, described the phenomenon; but when the
term became technical, it sufficed, without addition, to designate
the phenomenon.
[Note 1\4: _Hist. Ind. Sci._ b. iii. c. i.]
[Note 2\4: _Hist. Ast._ b. iii. c. i. sect. 8.]
In Mechanics, the Greeks gave a scientific precision to very few
words: we may mention _weights_ (βάρεα), the _arms of a lever_
(μήχεα), its _fulcrum_ (ὑπομόχλιον), and the verb _to balance_
(ἰσσοῤῥοπεῖν). Other terms which they used, as _momentum_ (ῥοπὴ) and
_force_ (δύναμις), did not acquire a distinct and definite meaning
till the time of Galileo, or later. We may observe that all abstract
terms, though in their scientific application expressing mere
conceptions, were probably at first derived from some word
describing external objects. Thus the Latin word for force, _vis_,
seems to be connected with a Greek word, ἲς, or ϝὶς, which often has
nearly the same meaning; but originally, as it would seem, signified
a sinew or muscle, the obvious seat of animal strength.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account