Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
The subject of the Tides is, in like manner, destitute of any name
which designates the science concerned about it. I have ventured to
employ the term _Tidology_, having been much engaged in tidological
researches.
Many persons possess a peculiarity of vision, which disables them
from distinguishing certain colours. On examining many such cases,
we find that in all such persons the peculiarities are the same; all
of them confounding scarlet with green, and pink with blue. Hence
they form a class, which, for the convenience of physiologists and
others, ought to have a fixed designation. Instead of calling them,
as has usually been done, 'persons having a peculiarity of vision,'
we might take a Greek term implying this meaning, and term them
_Idiopts_.
But my business at present is not to speak of the selection of new
terms when they are introduced, but to illustrate the maxim that the
necessity for their introduction often arises. The construction of
new terms will be treated of subsequently. {285}
APHORISM VIII.
_Terms must be constructed and appropriated so as to be fitted to
enunciate simply and clearly true general propositions._
THIS Aphorism may be considered as the fundamental principle and
supreme rule of all scientific terminology. It is asserted by
Cuvier, speaking of a particular case. Thus he says[24\4] of Gmelin,
that by placing the lamantin in the genus of morses, and the siren
in the genus of eels, he had rendered every general proposition
respecting the organization of those genera impossible.
[Note 24\4: _Règne Animal_, Introd. viii.]
The maxim is true of words appropriated as well as invented, and
applies equally to the mathematical, chemical, and classificatory
sciences. With regard to most of these, and especially the two
former classes, it has been abundantly exemplified already, in what
has previously been said, and in the _History of the Sciences_. For
we have there had to notice many technical terms, with the occasions
of their introduction; and all these occasions have involved the
intention of expressing in a convenient manner some truth or
supposed truth. The terms of Astronomy were adopted for the purpose
of stating and reasoning upon the relations of the celestial
motions, according to the doctrine of the sphere, and the other laws
which were discovered by astronomers. The few technical terms which
belong to Mechanics, _force_, _velocity_, _momentum_, _inertia_,
&c., were employed from the first with a view to the expression of
the laws of motion and of rest; and were, in the end, limited so as
truly and simply to express those laws when they were fully
ascertained. In Chemistry, the term _phlogiston_ was useful, as has
been shown in the _History_, in classing together processes which
really are of the same nature; and the nomenclature of the _oxygen_
theory was still preferable, because it enabled the chemist to
express a still greater number of general truths. {286}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account