Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
AS the Seventh Aphorism asserted that novelties in language may be
and ought to be introduced, when they aid the enunciation of truths,
we now declare that they are not admissible in any other case. New
terms and new systems of terms are not to be introduced, for
example, in virtue of their own neatness or symmetry, or other
merits, if there is no occasion for their use.
I may mention, as an old example of a superfluous attempt of this
kind, an occurrence in the history of Astronomy. In 1628 John Bayer
and Julius Schiller devised a _Cœlum Christianum_, in which the
common names of the planets, &c., were replaced by those of Adam,
Moses, and the Patriarchs. The twelve Signs became the twelve
Apostles, and the constellations became sacred places and things.
Peireskius, who had to pronounce upon the value of this proposal,
praised the piety of the inventors, but did not approve, he
said[28\4], the design of perverting and confounding whatever of
celestial information from the period of the earliest memory is
found in books.
[Note 28\4: Gassendi, _Vita Peireskii_, 300.]
Nor are slight anomalies in the existing language of science
sufficient ground for a change, if they do not seriously interfere
with the expression of our knowledge. Thus Linnæus says[29\4] that a
fair generic name is not to be exchanged for another though apter
one: and[30\4] if we separate an old genus into several, we must try
to find names for them among the synonyms which describe the old
genus. This maxim excludes the restoration of ancient names long
disused, no less than the needless invention of new ones. Linnæus
{291} lays down this rule[31\4]; and adds, that the botanists of the
sixteenth century well nigh ruined botany by their anxiety to
recover the ancient names of plants. In like manner Cuvier[32\4]
laments it as a misfortune, that he has had to introduce many new
names; and declares earnestly that he has taken great pains to
preserve those of his predecessors.
[Note 29\4: _Phil. Bot._ 246.]
[Note 30\4: _Ib._ 247.]
[Note 31\4: _Phil. Bot._ 248.]
[Note 32\4: _Règne Anim._ Pref. xvi.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account