Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
Thus the difficulty which we have been illustrating, of
distinguishing Facts from inferences and from interpretations of
facts, is not only great, but amounts to an impossibility. The
separation at which we aimed in the outset of this discussion, and
which was supposed to be necessary in order to obtain a firm
groundwork for science, is found to be unattainable. We cannot
obtain a sure basis of Facts, by rejecting all inferences and
judgments of our own, for such inferences and judgments form an
unavoidable element in all Facts. We cannot exclude our Ideas from
our Perceptions, for our Perceptions involve our Ideas.
3. But still, it cannot be doubted that in selecting the Facts which
are to form the foundation of Science, {54} we must reduce them to
their most simple and certain form; and must reject everything from
which doubt or errour may arise. Now since this, it appears, cannot
be done, by rejecting the Ideas which all Facts involve, in what
manner are we to conform to the obvious maxim, that the Facts which
form the basis of Science must be perfectly definite and certain?
The analysis of facts into Ideas and Sensations, which we have so
often referred to, suggests the answer to this inquiry. We are not
able, nor need we endeavour, to exclude Ideas from our Facts; but we
may be able to discern, with perfect distinctness, the Ideas which
we include. We cannot observe any phenomena without applying to them
such Ideas as Space and Number, Cause and Resemblance, and usually,
several others; but we may avoid applying these Ideas in a wavering
or obscure manner, and confounding Ideas with one another. We cannot
read any of the inscriptions which nature presents to us, without
interpreting them by means of some language which we ourselves are
accustomed to speak; but we may make it our business to acquaint
ourselves perfectly with the language which we thus employ, and to
interpret it according to the rigorous rules of grammar and analogy.
This maxim, that when Facts are employed as the basis of Science, we
must distinguish clearly the Ideas which they involve, and must
apply these in a distinct and rigorous manner, will be found to be a
more precise guide than we might perhaps at first expect. We may
notice one or two Rules which flow from it.
4. In the first place. Facts, when used as the materials of physical
Science, must be _referred to Conceptions of the Intellect only_,
all emotions of fear, admiration, and the like, being rejected or
subdued. Thus, the observations of phenomena which are related as
portents and prodigies, striking terrour and boding evil, are of no
value for purposes of science. The tales of armies seen warring in
the sky, the sound of arms heard from the clouds, fiery dragons,
chariots, swords seen in the air, may refer to meteorological
phenomena; but the records of phenomena observed in the {55} state
of mind which these descriptions imply can be of no scientific
value. We cannot make the poets our observers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account