Tall, slender, and graceful in form. Fair and exquisite in
complexion. Bright and sunny in expression. The hair long and
golden, but the brows and lashes dark and the eyes deep set and
hazel, and by turns dreamy and penetrating. The mouth rich, full,
and exquisitely formed. The broad brow prominent and sharply cut.
The nose delicate, slightly curved, and just sufficiently prominent
to give character to the face. And the dress somewhat fantastic as
became her looks. Anna Kingsford seemed at first more fairy than
human and more child than woman. For though really twenty-seven she
appeared scarcely seventeen, and made expressly to be caressed,
petted and indulged, and by no means to be taken seriously.
These impressions as regards her character were appreciably modified on
subsequent acquaintance, and Mr Maitland observes that “when she warmed
to her favourite themes, her whole being radiant with a spiritual light,
her utterances were those in turn of a savant, a sage, and a child, each
part suiting her as well as if it were her one and only character.”
The relationship between the authors of _The Perfect Way_ and the
founders of the Theosophical Society in the days of its infancy affords
matter of no little interest. The basic idea of the Theosophical
Society, viz. the harmonising of the esoteric side of all religions,
naturally suggested to the promoters of the movement that in the authors
of so remarkable a work, they would find a tower of strength, and Madame
Blavatsky, in particular, was most anxious to obtain their support and
co-operation for the British section of the Society. Eventually, after
considerable hesitation, Anna Kingsford responded to the advances made
to her, and accepted the presidency of the British section. But the
arrangement was not one which was destined to last long. That it was not
likely to be a success might, I think, have been readily enough
foreseen. Anna Kingsford and Edward Maitland were too uncompromising in
their point of view—too positive that the source of their own
information could not be impugned, to accept readily the _bona fides_ of
other and, as they considered, lower oracles. This, however, was by no
means all. The attitude of Theosophy in its early days towards
Christianity was in the main hostile. To make the esoteric
interpretation of this creed the pivot of their teaching was the last
idea they contemplated. Madame Blavatsky had attacked Christianity in
_Isis Unveiled_. Mr Sinnett was equally unsympathetic. The basis of
their actual teaching was an interpretation of Eastern religions,
whereas the basis of _The Perfect Way_ was an interpretation of Western.
Anna Kingsford was just as unhesitating in giving her preference to
Christianity as the leaders of Theosophy were in according theirs to
Buddhism, Hinduism, and kindred Oriental philosophies. Mrs Besant’s
attitude when she joined the Society showed similar preferences. Her
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account