Of the importance of religious opinionsNecker, Jacques
Religion
Of the importance of religious opinions
Necker, Jacques
Christianity -- Early works to 1800
We distinguish, in a single character which our judgment can decypher,
an absolute difference between soul and matter: we cannot avoid
representing the latter as infinitely divisible, whilst, on the
contrary, all the efforts of our imagination could never divide that
indivisible unit which composes the soul, and which is the sovereign
over our will, thoughts, and all our faculties[5].
But if we examine again, under another appearance, the properties of
matter, we know not how to assimilate to them the emotions of our soul;
for we distinctly feel those emotions, let their number be ever so
numerous, when even they act together and terminate in the same center,
which is that Indivisible Being before alluded to; whereas matter, by an
essential property, cannot, in the same instant be pressed or struck in
several manners, unless it is in parts which have a tendency to
different centres.
There is not then any resemblance between the impressions that our souls
receive, and the various effects which may be attributed to the action
of all the material substances of which we can form any conception: they
are always connected with the idea of space and extent; but that centre,
where all our perceptions meet, that Judge, who dictates laws in the
internal empire, whose revolutions we only know, that last Director of
our will, this Indivisible Being, at the same time our friend and
master, is not to be found in any compounded idea; and this unity so
simple, ought necessarily to convince us, that nothing which is
submitted to the dominion of our senses, can serve as a type of the idea
which we are to form of the soul.
We discover the traces of this truth, when we fix our attention on the
comparisons with which our spiritual unit, our identical self, is
continually occupied: we imagine it seated on a throne, listening, and
examining the various reasons which ought to determine its action; we
see it, like Nero, yielding sometimes to Narcissus, and sometimes to
Burrhus; but at the same time we distinctly perceive all the
counsellors, all the flatterers, all the enemies which surround it; we
never remark but a single master in the midst of the tumult and the
intrigues of this court.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account