Of the importance of religious opinionsNecker, Jacques
Religion
Of the importance of religious opinions
Necker, Jacques
Christianity -- Early works to 1800
FINIS.
_I was engrossed by the last Cares which the Publication of this
Book occasioned, when M. de_ CALONNE’S _Second Memorial made its
Appearance. I have read it; and I here publicly engage to answer
this new Attack, and fully to support the Credit which is justly
due to the Account I presented to the King in 1781._
NECKER.
-----
Footnote 1:
Thesis proposed by the French Academy, with a prize, for the best
Catechism of Morals, the instructions of which were to be founded on
the principles of natural right only.
Footnote 2:
I should have enlarged this chapter, if I did not intend to make some
general reflections on intolerance in another part of this work.
Footnote 3:
These various reflections are very necessary in the place where I
live; since, for a short time, labourers have been permitted to work,
at Paris, of a Sunday. We see this publicly done at the new bridge,
which is building over the Seine, as if a work of mere convenience was
in such haste, that the laws should be dispensed with to accelerate
its execution. The labourers, some will say, are glad to gain a day
every week. Undoubtedly, because they see only the present instant,
they have reason to think so; but it is the duty of government to
consider, in a more comprehensive point of view, the interest of the
people, of that part of society, which is so blind, or so limited in
its calculation; and the church should examine also, if the sudden
alteration of a practice so ancient, may not give rise to an idea,
that the spirit of religion is grown feeble. For the nations where
this spirit is best preserved, have the greatest respect for the
Sabbath.
Footnote 4:
This mass is commonly called a low mass.
Footnote 5:
Some say, in order to weaken this argument, that we may attribute to
the indivisible unit all the qualities of matter, that a round body is
really divisible, but that roundness and impenetrability are not. Such
an objection is evidently not just. Roundness and impenetrability are
only qualities, and these qualities, when merely abstract, are
necessarily invariable: thus, it is as impossible to divide it, as it
is to multiply and increase it; but my soul, my thoughts, the
consciousness that I have of my own existence, forms a particular and
personal being; and if it were of the same nature as matter, ought to
be equally divisible.
Footnote 6:
I shall present some reflections on this truth in another Chapter.
Footnote 7:
Dr. Herschel.
Footnote 8:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account