Of the importance of religious opinionsNecker, Jacques
Religion
Of the importance of religious opinions
Necker, Jacques
Christianity -- Early works to 1800
In short, even when, by the art of sophistry, some philosophers have, at
length, thrown into confusion the true principles of order and
happiness; when, by the force of address, they have led us to doubt
about the kind and degree of power which it is necessary to assign to
religion, it should not, however, be the legislators of the nation who
ought to lend an ear to their subtle distinctions.
Metaphysical sentiments and ideas are not proper for statesman, but in
their own defence; to assist them to guard themselves from the
ascendency of brilliant errors, and to confirm the respect due to useful
truths: but when they have to guide minds, when they wish to excite
activity, it is always, if they are wise, the most simple idea that they
will make use of; and they will be very careful not to despise those
habitual principles, to which time, still more then knowledge, has given
a sanction. These are so many lessons, which long experience seems to
have gradually disengaged from every thing foreign to natural morality
and the secret sentiments of men.
CHAP. VII.
_On Religious Opinions, in their Relation with Sovereigns._
Many nations, either by choice, or necessity, have deposited their wills
in the hands of an individual; and have thus erected a perpetual
monument to the spirit of discord, and injustice, which has so
frequently reigned amongst men. It is true, that from time to time they
have wished to recollect that they were capable of knowing themselves
their true interest; but monarchs mistrusting their inconstancy, have
taken care to fortify the springs of authority, by surrounding
themselves with standing armies; and they have only left them the power
of being disgusted with slavery: soldiers and taxes have supported each
other; and through the assistance of this corresponding action, they
have become masters and directors of every thing. How much good and evil
depend on them? We then necessarily wish them to possess a vigorous
morality, proportioned to their immense duties; but what force will your
morality have, if they perceive at last, that it is not supported by a
divine sanction; if they consider it as a human institution, which they
have power to break, and which they are in the habit of modifying? At
least they will have the liberty, like other men, to examine if their
private interest agrees with that of the public, and their conduct will
depend on the result of this calculation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account