Oliver Constable, miller and baker, Vol. 3 (of 3)Tytler, Sarah
Philosophy
Oliver Constable, miller and baker, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Tytler, Sarah
England -- Social conditions -- 19th century -- Fiction
Oliver had not been greatly attracted previously to these reverent
Weatherleys, in any chance intercourse which he had held with them. He
had respected them as very worthy people, but they had seemed to him,
what they were, somewhat fanatical and narrow in their views. As for
Harry Stanhope, no two persons could have been more widely removed from
what he had proved hitherto, or could have possessed less in common
with his past, than the strongly professional as well as pious couple
who were taking, but scarcely enjoying, a compulsory breathing space in
their toiling life.
But from the moment that Mrs. Weatherley’s motherliness appropriated
the care of Fan’s baby, Harry, as it were, instinctively—with another
of his instincts of self-preservation probably—took to her and clung
to her and her husband in his misery, with a pathetic dependence and
trust, to which they were not slow to respond.
Indeed, Harry’s remorse from an early stage assumed the form of
contriteness rather than despair, his natural humility and amiability
standing him in good stead here. Fan had willed his rescue from folly
and evil with her whole devoted heart, and though he would never now
have the consolation—the positive gladness, of proving to her that he
was a rescued man, and so, of more than making up to her, in her love,
for all the anguish he had cost her, he was still, in his present mood,
eager to do what Fan had wished, to be as she had chosen for him, in
his best interests. He trusted brokenly that it might atone—if it were
only to her memory, that Fan might know he was sorry and was pulling
himself up, somehow, sometime—that Fan’s God and his would accept and
confirm the late repentance in the great redemption He has provided for
sinners.
Poor Harry had never been proud, and he was not afflicted with
the insane egotism which sees in its possessor an object of such
consequence in the universe, to his Maker no less than to himself, that
he must needs interfere with the working of human and divine love.
Such a one-sided reasoner will hold, against every assurance to the
contrary, that he has sinned beyond forgiveness, and it is too late
for him to repent and think better of it. In fact, there is a false
Mephistopheles dignity and subtle compensation in this conclusion, when
shame, regret, and grief still take the attitude of resentful defiance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account