The cause of the quarrel was the Navigation Act, passed by England for
the express purpose of building up the English commercial marine at the
expense of the Dutch. The latter were then the world’s carriers on the
ocean. They derived an immense profit from carrying the goods of other
countries, in their own bottoms, from these other countries to England.
The Navigation Act forbade this, allowing only English bottoms to be
used to carry goods to England, unless the goods were carried in the
ships of the country from which they came. This is the kind of measure
especially condemned by the _laissez-faire_ school of economists, and
its good results in this case have always puzzled them; while, on the
other hand, its success under one set of conditions has been often
ignorantly held to justify its application under entirely different
conditions. In other words, like the system of protective tariffs, it is
one of those economic measures which may or may not be useful to a
country, according to changes in time and circumstances. In the
Cromwellian period it benefited the English as much as it hurt the
Dutch, and laid the foundation of English commercial supremacy. Another
cause of war was the insistance by the English upon their right to have
their flag saluted by the Dutch as well as by other foreign powers.
There followed a bloody and obstinate struggle for the mastery of the
seas. Battle after battle was fought between the Dutch and English
fleets. The latter were commanded by Blake, Monk, Dean, and other
officers, who had won distinction ashore—for the process of
differentiation between military service on land and on the sea was far
from complete. The fighting was most determined, and the Dutch won two
or three victories; but they were defeated again and again, until
finally beaten into submission. The war was one undertaken purely from
motives of commercial greed, against the nation which, among all the
nations of continental Europe, stood closest to England in religious
belief, in form of government, in social ideas, and in its system of
political liberty. Cromwell hated the thought of the two free Protestant
powers battling one another to exhaustion, while every ecclesiastical
and political tyranny looked on with a grin of approbation. He wished
the alliance, not the enmity, of Holland; and though, when the war was
once on, he and those he represented refused in any way to embarrass
their own government, yet they were anxious for peace. The Parliament,
on the other hand, hailed the rise of the Navy under Blake as a
counterpoise to the power of the army under Cromwell. One effect of this
Dutch War was to postpone the question of the dissolution of Parliament;
another, to cause increased taxation, which was met by levying on the
estates of the Royalist Delinquents, so-called.
[Illustration:
Admiral Robert Blake.
From the portrait at Wadham College, Oxford.
By permission of the Master of Wadham.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account