At the beginning, everything seemed to go well. He opened the Parliament
with one of those noteworthy speeches of which some seventeen have been
preserved; speeches in the proper sense, unquestionably better when
spoken to listeners than when read by critics, but instinct with the
rough power of the speaker, permeated with religious fervor and sincere
striving after the right; and even where the reasoning is most
wrong-headed, containing phrases and sentiments which show the keenest
insight into the needs of the moment, and the needs of eternity as well.
The sentences are often very involved, it being quite evident that the
speeches were not written out, not even deliberately thought out, in
advance; for Oliver, even as he spoke, kept dropping and rejecting such
of his half-finished utterances as did not give sufficiently accurate or
vehement expression to his thought. Yet they contain abundance of the
loftiest thought, expressed in language which merely gains strength from
its rude, vigorous homeliness. For generations after Cromwell’s death,
the polished cynics and dull pedants, who abhorred and misunderstood
him, spoke of his utterances with mixed ridicule and wrath: Hume
hazarding the opinion that if his speeches, letters, and writings, were
gathered together they would form “one of the most nonsensical
collections the world had ever seen.” We could far better afford to lose
every line Hume ever wrote than the speeches of Cromwell.
In his opening address he pointed out that what the nation most needed
was healing and settling; and in a spirit of thoroughly English
conservatism, denounced any merely revolutionary doctrines which would
do away with the security of property, or would give the tenant “as
liberal a fortune” as the landlord. In religious matters also, he
condemned those who could do nothing but cry: “Overturn! Overturn!!
Overturn!!!” and together with his praise of what had been done, and of
the body to which he spoke, he mingled much advice, remarking: “I hope
you will not be unwilling to hear a little again of the sharp as well as
of the sweet.” He exhorted them to go to work in sober earnest; to
remedy in practical shape any wrongs, and to join with him in working
for good government. Unfortunately, he made the mental reservation that
he should be himself the ultimate judge of what good government was.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account