Omphalos : $b an attempt to untie the geological knotGosse, Philip Henry
Religion
Omphalos : $b an attempt to untie the geological knot
Gosse, Philip Henry
Bible and geology; Creation; Evolution (Biology)
[2] As Cuvier, Buckland, and many others. On the question whether the
phenomena of Geology can be comprised within the short period formerly
assigned to them, the Rev. Samuel Charles Wilts long ago observed:
"Buckland, Sedgwick, Faber, Chalmers, Conybeare, and many other
Christian geologists, strove long with themselves to believe that they
could: and they did not give up the hope, or seek for a new
interpretation of the sacred text, till they considered themselves
driven from their position by such facts as we have stated. If, _even
now, a reasonable, or we might say_ POSSIBLE _solution were offered,
they would_, we feel persuaded, _gladly revert_ to their original
opinion."--_Christian Observer_, August, 1834.
[3] Reflections on Geology.
[4] Geology and Geologists.
[5] New System of Geology.
[6] Mineral and Mosaic Geologies, p. 430.
[7] Geology of Scripture.
[8] Scriptural Geology, _passim._
[9] Letter to Buckland, 15, _et seq._
[10] Origen, Augustine, &c.
[11] Testimony of the Rocks, p. 144
[12] Discourse (5th Ed.), 115.
[13] Sac. Hist. of World.
[14] Rec. of Creation.
[15] Nat. Theology.
[16] Pre-Adamite Earth.
[17] Harmony of Scripture and Geology.
[18] Christian Observer, 1834.
[19] Religion of Geology, Lect. ii.
[20] Scripture and Geology.
[21] I am not _replying_ to any of these conflicting opinions; else,
with respect to this one, I might consider it sufficient to adduce the
_ipsissima verba_ of the inspired text. Not a word is said of Adam's
being "nine hundred and thirty years _old_;" the plain statement is as
follows:--"And _all the days that Adam lived_ were nine hundred and
thirty years." (Gen. v. 5.)
[22] "Protoplast," pp. 58, 59; p. 325; 2d. Ed.
[23] Unity of Worlds (1856), pp. 488, 493.
[24] "A geological truth must command our assent as powerfully as that
of the existence of our own minds, or of the Deity himself; and any
revelation which stands opposed to such truths _must be false_. The
geologist has therefore _nothing to do with revealed religion_ in his
scientific inquiries."--_Edinb. Review_, xv. 16.
[25] Ansted's Ancient World, 18.
[26] Ansted's Ancient World, 30.
[27] Scripture and Geology, 371. (Ed. 1855.)
[28] "It is by no means unlikely that some beds of coal were derived
from the mass of vegetable matter present at one time on the surface,
and submerged suddenly. It is only necessary to refer to the accounts of
vegetation in some of the extremely moist, warm islands in the southern
hemisphere, where the ground is occasionally covered with eight or ten
feet of decaying vegetable matter at one time, to be satisfied that this
is at least possible."
[29] Ansted's Anc. World, 75.
[30] M'Culloch's System of Geology, i. 506.
[31] Origin of Coal.
[32] Testimony of the Rocks, p. 78.
[33] Mr. Newman suggests that they were "marsupial bats" (Zoologist, p.
129). I have adopted his attitudes, but have not ventured to give them
mammalian ears.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account