Blessed are the ignorant. Their lack of suspicion secures them,
whenever they glance at the world, the enthusiasm of discovery
and invention, and every phenomenon delights them as something
unprecedented. During the lifetime of Puvis de Chavannes his peculiar
style was particularly extolled by his eulogists. They exhibited him
as a God-sent foundling; as a Moses of painting, without ancestors,
himself an ancestor; as a great solitary wandering apart from the
multitude through the history of contemporary art. Such phrases can be
uttered only by one who rejoices in the most refreshing ignorance of
the historical continuity of things. Puvis is of a family. The expert
can name his forefathers and relations; he finds their lineaments
repeated—often coarsened and disfigured—in him.
Puvis, this great, original genius of his admirers, is an impoverished
descendant of Cornelius. He represents the worst aberration in art
that this century has seen, viz., thought-painting. Nowadays it is
no longer necessary to prove that abstraction is the negation and
abrogation of plastic art. This maxim, fortunately, has become an
æsthetic commonplace. Painting has to do only with sensuous phenomena;
abstraction distils from the sensuous one quality, which, since it is
common to many phenomena, is reminiscent of many phenomena, yet is
itself not phenomenon. He who feels the impulse to paint not views but
thoughts, proves that in his innermost soul he is not a painter, but a
rhetorician, and that he has deceived himself marvellously as to the
method of expression natural and organic to him. Cornelius’s painting
presented thoughts, religious, philosophical, and historical dogmas, in
a picture-language considerably less clearly than might have been done
in well-ordered words. It pleased all those whose soul was seven times
sealed against understanding what really constitutes painting. As long
as the Cornelius tendency was dominant in Germany, that country was
depressingly behind in the art life of the period. As soon as Cornelius
and his school were overthrown, a sound development of German painting
began. And now, at the close of the nineteenth century in France,
in the France which has produced, in landscape, Corot, Rousseau,
Diaz, Harpignies: in figure-painting, Millet, Courbet, Bonnat, Roll:
from which has come the return to nature and the renaissance of art,
the allegorical thought-painting of a Puvis has been praised as the
greatest advance, as the latest step in development! The snake biting
its own tail still remains the truest symbol of human activity that the
self-knowledge of the race has as yet discovered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account