Delacroix was not in love with life; he did not seek and find nature;
he followed in her footsteps only in books. He was essentially an
illustrator; apart from Victor Hugo he is not to be thought of. The
Romantics performed a duty of gratitude when, with fanatical violence,
they carried him triumphantly through his detractors. He is their
henchman with the brush; he fights with them and for them. They only
act according to the rules of chivalry when they protect him. His
magic colouring is not to be contested, although it is often gaudy and
theatrical. But out of his “Hamlet with the Gravediggers,” his “Medea,”
his “Bride of Abydos,” his “Abduction of Rebecca” (“Ivanhoe”), a dreary
waste stares us in the face, which would be hardly bearable if we did
not happen to know the poems from which Delacroix drew his subjects.
We must put life into his dead pictures by what we remember of our
reading. Delacroix stops at the externals. We have to add soul and
passion.
After the men of 1830 came, on the one side, the neat painters of
the Empire, of whom Meissonier is the best type; on the other, the
naturalists with Courbet, the impressionists with Manet and Monet; and
so the development went on to the confused struggles of this moment.
That period of the July Revolution was felt by its contemporaries as
an age of storm and stress in art. On us later-born children it has
the effect of halcyon days, the full, rapturous life and sunny joys of
which the present generation longs for in vain.
VII
THE TRIUMPH OF A REVOLUTION
THE REALISTS
In the last years of the Empire and the first of the Republic, great
things occurred on the sacred hill of Montmartre, on the summit of
which the Church of the Sacred Heart had not yet supplanted the Muses
and Graces. A group of painters, diminishing in number, yet brave
as lions, and pugnacious, arose in defence and attack against the
official art of the _Académie_, the _École des Beaux Arts_, and the
_Salon_, which was still an institution of the State. Their palette
was a battle-shield, their brush a lethal weapon for cutting and
thrusting, their easel a barricade. Uproar was what they painted, and
plunder and carnage were the subjects of their conversation in endless
beer and tobacco sessions. They wanted to massacre the old idols in
oil-painting, and the tyrants of the plastic arts now become twaddlers.
No more painting by tinker, plumber, or chimney-sweep! No soot in
place of air! No Dutch dolls in tin armour, with volunteer firemen’s
brass helmets on their gingerbread heads! On the contrary, an honest
rendering of phenomena of light and colour from actual observation,
sincerity, open air, and impression.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account