From the first moment, then, realism had the honours of the opposition
press and the support of those politicians, the majority of whom, later
on, were to play the principal parts in the revolt of the Commune.
The artists, to be sure, despised it at first, as long as it gained
no _Salon_ distinctions and had no market. For a long time—for some
decades—it had none. The public regarded the works of the new movement
only as expressions of unconscious or intentional artistic humour.
It laughed at them as it did at the saucy caricatures in the comic
papers. There was perhaps only one individual who, a generation ago,
took the Manets and Monets, the Renoirs and Pissarros seriously, and
was prepared to manifest his belief in them by ready money—the only
genuine martyrdom in our days—and this seer, prophet, and confessor was
Caillebotte. He bought their pictures; not at a big price, it is true,
for we must not expect the superhuman from mere mortals, but he bought
them; he poured out his red gold for them, and this sacrifice probably
preserved the life of realism, or, at any rate, of its teachers.
Caillebotte himself painted, but only for himself, and that was
praiseworthy; but what was more important, he had acquired a handsome
fortune by commerce, and spent the major portion of his fine income on
open-air pictures. He did not exhaust his enthusiasm by that. When he
died, he bequeathed the most striking pieces—“the pearls,” he called
them—of his collection to the French State, on the condition that it
left them together and accommodated them with a room in a Paris museum.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account