of Making Enemies”—he exchanged with the artist remarks like these:
“Which part of the picture, then, really represents the bridge? Do
you mean to say that this is the proper representation of a bridge?”
(The question referred to “Battersea Bridge by Moonlight.”) “I had no
intention of giving an exact copy of the bridge.” “Do these daubs of
colour on it represent human beings?” “They represent what you please.”
“Is that thing under there a boat?” “It is a consolation to me that you
recognise it. My whole object was only to produce a definite harmony
of colours.” He could hear this harmony of colours: Ruskin and Judge
Huddleston could not. It was utterly futile to try to make them feel it.
His peculiarity of giving his pictures fine and pretentious names,
such as “Black and Gold,” “Blue and Silver,” “Ivory and Gold,” “Purple
and Gold” is also generally misunderstood. People read “Silver and
Blue,” and saw indistinctly intricate brush-strokes of blue with
elevations in dead white, representing, by way of indication, the high
seas by night and in a mist. People hurried to the picture labelled
“Ivory and Gold,” expecting to gaze at something like an ancient
chryselephantine marvel, or a Florentine masterpiece of splendour
belonging to the days of the Medici, and what did they find? The
lightly executed sketch of a woman in a yellow and white harmony, in
which one looked in vain for the costly materials promised by the
title. Not Philistines alone have shaken their heads over this, and
evil-disposed critics have talked of hoaxing, foppery, and American
bluff. They have wronged the artist bitterly. He was absolutely honest;
his optical hyper-sensitiveness felt the colour with so heightened an
appreciation of tone that he really saw gold, silver, and purple, where
a less susceptible sense could only see dull yellow, deadened white,
undecided reddish-brown. In all probability, it was long before he
realised that others failed to observe, in the appearance of the actual
things and his pictures of them, the rare metals and precious stones,
the pearls and ivory, which gleamed from them to him. The common
phrase, which is a precipitate of the universal thought and feeling,
speaks of sun-gold and moon-silver. Sun and moon consequently make
such a strong optical impression on even the average man that he thinks
of gold and silver with the accompanying higher notes of ideas of
splendour and magnificence. In Whistler’s consciousness, however, these
ideas began to be felt with gentle excitations, as whitish foam on dark
waves in the night, or a woman’s pale complexion in cream-coloured
raiment yielded them. These delicate charms affected his sensitiveness
just as the force of the sun or moon affects others. In maniacal
excitation, of which the acutest form is madness, the brain of the
sick person becomes so supersensitive that it reacts on the ordinary
impressions of the senses just as on intolerably violent irritations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account