Art criticism; Dramatic criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
It remained for the Norwich Art Circle to hold, for the first time,
an exhibition of the drawings of an artist who was nothing less than
a great master in water-colour, but whose place in the ranks of Art
was for many a year, by the general public, not so much contested as
ignored. Cotman was born a few years after Turner. Possessed of a
sensibility as keen, but of less tremendous vitality, he died a few
years before him. Turner was amongst Cotman’s friends; not a ‘chum,’
perhaps, but an advocate, strenuous and judicious--and strenuous and
judicious advocacy may claim to be called friendship. Had it not been
for Turner, it is unlikely that the less-known artist would have
received that post at King’s College which afforded him comfort, though
not affluence, in the last years of his life. Like Dewint, Cotman
taught drawing. But in London his connection was less influential
than that of Dewint, whose usual fee of a guinea an hour was no doubt
never reached by the draughtsman from Norwich. The appointment of
drawing-master at King’s College was therefore very serviceable: the
more so that Cotman’s original work, though it was produced with
the enthusiasm and the untiring enjoyment, and the sweat of the
brow besides, which in any art are the real artist’s equivalents or
substitutes for mechanical diligence--Cotman’s original work, I say
(like a little of Mozart’s best music), was produced ‘for himself and
two friends.’ Even the connoisseur, as a rule, held back. The public?
But can you for an instant expect the public to understand work which,
frankly, makes no bid for its sympathies, which is never furnished
‘according to sample,’ which is bound to be itself and wholly fresh,
and is content to be excellent? An intelligent criticism might perhaps
have drummed into the big public, not the real sense, but at all events
some tacit acceptance, of Cotman’s peculiar merit. But where was the
intelligent criticism of 1820 and 1830? There was little critical
writing then--at all events in the papers--that was either an influence
or an art.
John Sell Cotman was born at Norwich on the 16th of May 1782. His
father was a well-to-do haberdasher, established at that time in Cockey
Lane, but afterwards, when able to retire from business, living in a
villa at Thorpe, with a garden that looked on the river. Cotman himself
drew the garden--and idealised it--in the last year of his life. His
father survived him; dying very old--at eighty-four. Cotman died at
sixty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account