Art criticism; Dramatic criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
It is too early, of course, to attempt to settle definitely the place
of Leighton in English Art; but it is certain that his influence,
whether as President or painter, tended to the extension of its vistas.
An upholder of the Classic--never, with all his range, much in love
with Realism--he was yet nothing whatever of a partisan, and--it may
be mentioned as a characteristic detail of him in his daily ways--he
was accustomed from time to time to purchase clever little drawings
(sometimes the very last one would have thought he would care for)
by artists who esteemed him as a President, but who regarded him
very lightly as a practitioner of their own craft. Lord Leighton was
perfectly aware that several circumstances limited--especially of late
years--the appreciation of his work. He was not altogether insensible
of its real defects--at all events, of peculiarities which were defects
upon occasion. He knew that his ‘brush-work’ was not absolutely
‘modern.’ He must have allowed that, now and again, when it was by
no means one of his aims to seek it, the texture of his flesh was
porcelain-like, and thus mainly conventional. He was, confessedly, not
greatly occupied with ‘values’ of colour, with the relation of part to
part. He was at one--perhaps more than they knew it--with many of our
newest artists in demanding a decorative quality; only the decorative
quality of his choice was not always--was, indeed very seldom--that of
theirs. A successful pattern of colour they could understand the virtue
of. The Japanese, or Mr. Whistler, had taught it them. But a successful
pattern of line, they were less capable of appreciating. They, for
example, or some of them, execrated Bouguereau, and resented in some
degree the hospitality prominently offered to that distinguished
Frenchman on the walls of the Academy. Lord Leighton, on the other
hand, was, very possibly, not fully alive to Bouguereau’s vices or
failings--to his mere smoothness, softness, not infrequent vapidness
of human expression. But he valued justly Bouguereau’s possession
of the best Academic graces, of faultless composition and subtle
draughtsmanship. For these things--these best Academic graces--he
himself strove. These, too, he generally, though not always, attained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account