Art criticism; Dramatic criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
unnecessarily questioned by such an industrious authority as Justi,
who considers that it is the work of a Fleming. Not even the most
audacious of assailants has ventured to throw doubt upon the portrait
of ‘Quevedo’--a head and shoulders, black and deep brown-grey--the poet
wearing conspicuously those thick and dark-rimmed glasses which, by
reason of too assiduous study, he is reported never for a moment after
middle life to have been able to dispense with.
With Mr. Huth’s portrait of Philip the Fourth, a full-length, life-size
figure, and with the portrait of Don Balthasar, the eldest son of
a monarch who would appear to have spent an appreciable portion of
his lifetime in the painting-room of Velasquez, the artist reaches
the hill-top--a summit, fortunately, from which, even to the end of
his days, he was not destined to descend. The ‘Don Balthasar’ is
the possession of the Duke of Westminster. It shows the child in
a costume enriched with gold and silver, mounted upon a prancing
pony, in the courtyard of the palace; and finely painted as the face
is, the picture, as a whole, illustrates the justice of Mr. R. M.
Stevenson’s contention that in the outdoor full-length portraits, in
which _ensemble_, and atmosphere, realised background even, a sense of
the presence of the actual world, must needs count for so much, there
is not to be looked for that searching and intimate treatment of
the visage which Velasquez reserved in the main for works which were
studies of the head alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account