On chloroform and other anæsthetics: their action and administrationSnow, John
History
On chloroform and other anæsthetics: their action and administration
Snow, John
Anesthetics; Chloroform; Snow, John, 1813-1858
_Idiosyncrasy._ The accidents from chloroform have frequently been
attributed to idiosyncrasy in the patient. This, it may be observed, is
not to give an explanation of them, but merely to state that they depend
on something we do not understand; that something, however, being in the
person to whom the accident happens. This view receives apparent support
from the supposition that the chloroform has been inhaled in exactly the
same manner in the fatal cases as in other instances; but this apparent
support fails when it is pointed out that the supposed same manner is
only an equally uncertain manner. The different effects that have been
produced on the same patient at different times, and the great number of
instances in which medical men have failed to make the patient
insensible, show that most of the usual modes of exhibiting chloroform
are extremely uncertain.
What most completely meets the question of idiosyncrasy, however, is the
circumstance that in no fewer than eleven out of the fifty recorded
cases of death from chloroform, the patient had previously inhaled this
medicine without ill effects. In two other cases also, previous attempts
had been made to make the patient insensible without success, on the day
on which the accident occurred. In the above table of the fatal cases,
those are indicated in which previous inhalations had taken place. In
twenty-nine cases, I have concluded that the patient had not previously
inhaled, for the medical man, having given an account of the state of
his patient, and his reasons for administering the chloroform, would
certainly have mentioned such a material fact as a previous inhalation
if it had occurred. There are ten cases of which only a meagre account
is given, and where a previous administration of chloroform may possibly
have taken place without being mentioned; but if only eleven, out of the
fifty patients, who died from chloroform, had inhaled it previously
without ill effects, it is very clear that the fact of having inhaled it
with a favourable result, gives no immunity from the possibility of
accident. It would be impossible to say what proportion of the patients
who have inhaled chloroform have inhaled it more than once, but it is
not probable that they amount to more than 22 per cent., if so many.
_Alleged Impurity of the Chloroform._ At one time accidents from
chloroform were loosely attributed to impurity in the medicine, but this
was only a guess, and is opposed to the facts. No case of accident has
been traced to this cause, and in nearly all the cases of which the
details are given, it is distinctly recorded, either that the chloroform
was examined and found to be of good quality, or else that chloroform
out of the same bottle had been used in other cases without ill effects.
I have not thought it necessary to state this in quoting the individual
cases.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account