On chloroform and other anæsthetics: their action and administrationSnow, John
History
On chloroform and other anæsthetics: their action and administration
Snow, John
Anesthetics; Chloroform; Snow, John, 1813-1858
As these accidents seem to have occurred from continuing the inhalation
too long, they differ entirely from nearly all those which were actually
fatal, and which, as we have seen, arose from the too great
concentration of the vapour, and not from any want of care in watching
the patient, so as to be able to leave off at the right moment, if it
were possible. I have previously stated, that after breathing vapour of
the proper strength for inhalation, animals may always be readily
restored by artificial respiration after the breathing has ceased,
provided the heart is still beating. In the cases related by Mr.
Bickersteth, the heart had ceased to beat before the patients were
restored; but in the third case, there is distinct evidence that the
heart continued to beat for four minutes after the breathing had ceased.
It was, therefore, certainly not paralyzed by the direct action of the
chloroform. The patient was nearly in the condition of a drowned person,
where we know that there is a good prospect of recovery by artificial
respiration during the first few minutes after the breathing has ceased,
even if the action of the heart be imperceptible. In the other three
cases, also, it is probable that the breathing ceased before the action
of the heart; and, at all events, this organ was not paralyzed so
thoroughly as in the cases in which artificial respiration was promptly
applied without effect.
Several other cases have been related in the medical journals in which
patients have been restored by artificial respiration, after animation
had been suspended, more or less completely, by chloroform; but the
above remarks would, I believe, be applicable to all these cases.
Where patients have recovered under the use of other measures, without
artificial respiration, it is probable that animation was not completely
suspended, and that the recovery was spontaneous.
M. Delarue related a case of accident from chloroform to the Academy of
Medicine, on August 20th, 1850, which was apparently of this nature.
After administering the vapour, and when he was about to divide some
sinuses in the thigh, he found that his patient (a woman) was in a state
of collapse, and the breathing and pulse, “_pour ainsi dire_”,
insensible. The face was injected, and there was a bloody froth at the
mouth. The uvula was titillated, and there was immediate movement of the
eyelids, which was soon followed by copious vomiting, and the patient
recovered.[140]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account