Let the quadrant _OAB_ (in Fig. 146) be divided into two parts of equal
area, by the circular arc _MP_. It is required to determine (1) the
position of _P_ upon the arc of the quadrant, that is to say the angle
_BOP_; (2) the position of the point _M_ on the side _OA_; and (3) the
length of the arc _MP_ in terms of a radius of the quadrant.
(1) Draw _OP_; also _PC_ a tangent, meeting _OA_ in _C_; and _PN_,
perpendicular to _OA_. Let us call _a_ a radius; and θ the angle at
_C_, which is obviously equal to _OPN_, or _POB_. Then
_CP_ = _a_ cot θ; _PN_ = _a_ cos θ; _NC_ = _CP_ cos θ = _a_ ⋅ (cos^2 θ)/(sin θ).
The area of the portion _PMN_
= ½_C_(_P_^2)θ − ½_PN_ ⋅ _NC_
= ½_a_^2(cot^2 θ) − ½_a_(cos θ) ⋅ _a_(cos^2 θ)/(sin θ)
= ½_a_^2(cot^2 θ − (cos^3 θ)/(sin θ)).
{361}
And the area of the portion _PNA_
= ½_a_^2(π/2 − θ) − ½_ON_ ⋅ _NP_
= ½_a_^2(π/2 − θ) − ½_a_(sin θ) ⋅ _a_(cos θ)
= ½_a_^2(π/2 − θ − sin θ ⋅ cos θ).
Therefore the area of the whole portion _PMA_
= (_a_^2)/2 (π/2 − θ + θ cot^2 θ − (cos^3 θ)/sin θ − sin θ ⋅ cos θ)
= (_a_^2)/2 (π/2 − θ + θ cot^2 θ − cot θ),
and also, by hypothesis, = ½ ⋅ area of the quadrant, = (π_a_^2)/8.
[Illustration: Fig. 146.]
Hence θ is defined by the equation
_a_^2/2 (π/2 − θ + θ cot^2 θ − cot θ) = (π_a_^2)/8,
or π/4 − θ + θ cot^2 θ − cot θ = 0.
We may solve this equation by constructing a table (of which the
following is a small portion) for various values of θ.
θ π/4 − θ − cot θ + θ cot^2 θ = _x_
34° 34′ ·7854 − ·6033 − 1·4514 + 1·2709 = ·0016
35′ ·7854 ·6036 1·4505 1·2700 ·0013
36′ ·7854 ·6039 1·4496 1·2690 ·0009
37′ ·7854 ·6042 1·4487 1·2680 ·0005
38′ ·7854 ·6045 1·4478 1·2671 ·0002
39′ ·7854 ·6048 1·4469 1·2661 −·0002
40′ ·7854 ·6051 1·4460 1·2652 −·0005
{362}
We see accordingly that the equation is solved (as accurately as need
be) when θ is an angle somewhat over 34° 38′, or say 34° 38½′. That is
to say, a quadrant of a circle is bisected by a circular arc cutting
the side and the periphery of the quadrant at right angles, when
the arc is such as to include (90° − 34° 38′), i.e. 55° 22′ of the
quadrantal arc.
This determination of ours is practically identical with that which
Berthold arrived at by a rough and ready method, without the use of
mathematics. He simply tried various ways of dividing a quadrant of
paper by means of a circular arc, and went on doing so till he got the
weights of his two pieces of paper approximately equal. The angle, as
he thus determined it, was 34·6°, or say 34° 36′.
(2) The position of _M_ on the side of the quadrant _OA_ is given
by the equation _OM_ = _a_ cosec θ − _a_ cot θ; the value of which
expression, for the angle which we have just discovered, is ·3028. That
is to say, the radius (or side) of the quadrant will be divided by the
new partition into two parts, in the proportions of nearly three to
seven.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account