Working out _x′_ in the same way, we arrive at the approximate value, _x′_ + 1 = 1·517. {369} This is as much as to say that, supposing each cell tends to divide into two halves when (and not before) its original size is doubled, then, in our flattened disc, the triangular cell _T_ will tend to divide when the radius of the disc has increased by about a third (from 1 to 1·345), but the quadrilateral cell, _Q_, will not tend to divide until the linear dimensions of the disc have increased by about a half (from 1 to 1·517). The case here illustrated is of no small general importance. For it shews us that a uniform and symmetrical growth of the organism (symmetrical, that is to say, under the limitations of a plane surface, or plane section) by no means involves a uniform or symmetrical growth of the individual cells, but may, under certain conditions, actually lead to inequality among these; and this inequality may be further emphasised by differences which arise out of it, in regard to the order of frequency of further subdivision. This phenomenon (or to be quite candid, this hypothesis, which is due to Berthold) is entirely independent of any change or variation in individual surface tensions; and accordingly it is essentially different from the phenomenon of unequal segmentation (as studied by Balfour), to which we have referred on p. 348. In this fashion, we might go on to consider the manner, and the order of succession, in which the subsequent cell-divisions would tend to take place, as governed by the principle of minimal areas. But the calculations would grow more difficult, or the results got by simple methods would grow less and less exact. At the same time, some of these results would be of great interest, and well worth the trouble of obtaining. For instance, the precise manner in which our triangular cell, _T_, would next divide would be interesting to know, and a general solution of this problem is certainly troublesome to calculate. But in this particular case we can see that the width of the triangular cell near _P_ is so obviously less than that near either of the other two angles, that a circular arc cutting off that angle is bound to be the shortest possible bisecting line; and that, in short, our triangular cell will tend to subdivide, just like the original quadrant, into a triangular and a quadrilateral portion.