On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
But to resume;—the popular idea {113} seems to be, that Christianity is a
complete Revelation of certain truths concerning GOD and a future state;
and the end to be aimed at, therefore, is the impressing men strongly
with those truths, “applying them” (as the phrase is) “to individuals.”
The Catholic conception is, that Christianity is a sustained Revelation,
or Manifestation of realities; and the great end to be attained is the
participation therein.—Thus the Sectarian (according as his sentiments
might be) would dwell much on the idea of CHRIST’S moral teaching, as
being “pure” and “useful;” or again, would look on His Mediation and
Atonement, just as “doctrine” to be believed. The Catholic would
endeavour to regard CHRIST in a less abstract, a more literally
Scriptural way, as The Mysterious Incarnation of Godhead (1 Tim. iii.
16); the now and Ever-existing link between us and DEITY (1 Tim. ii.
5.)—the medium whereby man is united unto GOD! And His mysterious
Atonement would be regarded as an awful REALITY ever “manifest” in the
Church! (Gal. iii. 1; 1 Cor. xi. 26.)—a REALITY to be partaken of, and
more than a bare ‘truth’ to be believed in. (1 Cor. x. 16, 17.) The
former would go no further than to think that the end to be attained is,
the formation of a certain character in individuals, by certain moral
means; and so the whole of the constitutions of Christianity—Scriptures,
Sacraments, Ministries, and Churches, are but the means of accomplishing
this end. The latter believes much more; namely, that the great end to
be attained is the mystical incorporation of an unseen, yet eternal
community, called even now, the “kingdom of heaven.” On the one system,
we are independent beings: on the other, we are “blessed with all
spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ.” On the one system, it
is metaphorically only that we are said to be “one body in CHRIST,” while
we really are, and shall only be dealt with, as separate individuals: on
the other, the very reverse is assumed; namely, that “we, being many, are
one body in CHRIST,” in a mystical and Divine sense. The question
is—which view is more conformable to Holy Scripture?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account