On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
{63b} Such was the extent of discipline indeed, that even common
Christians in passing temporarily to another Church, had to take letters
of communion from their Bishop.
{65a} See Notes, No. II.
{65b} “Per Successiones Episcoporum pervenientem (h. e. Ecclesiam) usque
ad nos, judicantes confundimus omnes eos qui quoquo modo . . . præter
quam oportet colligunt.”—S. Irenæus, in lib. iii. adversus Hæreses, c. 3.
In which may be seen the Evidence of the teaching of Polycarp, St. John’s
disciple.
{66} “Quis enim _fidelis_ servus et prudens quem constituit Dominus ejus
super domum suam ut det cibos in tempore?”—Quod ad _Apostolos ceterosque
Episcopos et Doctores_ parabola ista pertineat manifestum est: maxime ex
eo quod apud Lucam (cap. xii.) Petrus interrogat dicens, “Ad nos
parabolam istam dicis? an ad omnes?”— . . . Ait Apostolus, (ad Cor. c.
iv.) “Ita nos existimet homo, ut ministros Christi et Dispensatores
Mysteriorum.”—Hîc jam quæritur inter dispensatores ut _fidelis_ quis
inveniatur, &c.—Origen. in Matth. Tractat. xxxi.
{67} See the next Lecture, towards the close.
{69} The second week in Advent.
{81a} See the Nicene Canons.
{81b} See Jewel’s Apology.
{82a} And again, virtually, by the Gallicans.
{82b} This is worthy of their consideration who are apt to be too
disheartened at the divisions in the English Church. When the Popedom
was a disputed matter for seventy years, what could the plain Catholic
laity have thought? It was impossible to avoid the anathema of one Pope
or the other, both pretending to infallibility. See Notes No. III.
{83} Such, for instance, as those glanced at in p. 47, 48, and referred
to in Notes No. II. and III.
{88} Connected with this part of the subject few books are so important
to be read as “Johnson’s Unbloody Sacrifice.”
{89} See also, among others, that striking passage, Rom. xv. 15.##
{93a} See Notes No. I.
{93b} 1 Kings xxii. 24.
{94} As, for instance, the cure of the blind man, by the clay. Or that
of the lepers.
{98} Sermons on Baptism, Absolution, and the Eucharist.
{99a} Bp. Hall’s Episcopacy by Divine Right, p. 6.
{99b} See Jewel, and Hooker. Ed. Keble. And Notes, No. IV.
{99c} “Non sumus _adeo felices_.” Words of the President of the Synod
of Dort.
{100} Melanchthon Ep. Luthero, quoted by Bishop Hall.
{101} A parallel case, to a certain extent, may be seen in Judges xvii.
5, 6, 13. &c. The priesthood of the LORD was associated partly with
idolatrous worship. Micah had graven images and teraphim, yet he, with a
Levite for a Priest, was partly blessed by GOD. It is not for us to say
how far GOD may bless those who are not strictly obeying Him;
nevertheless we must not calculate on this. Obedience is still a duty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account