With respect to artillery, the number of guns has naturally increased
since its first invention, and according as it has been made lighter
and otherwise improved; still since the time of Frederick the Great, it
has also kept very much to the same proportion of two or three guns per
1,000 men, we mean at the commencement of a campaign; for during its
course artillery does not melt away as fast as infantry, therefore at
the end of a campaign the proportion is generally notably greater,
perhaps three, four, or five guns per 1,000 men. Whether this is the
natural proportion, or that the increase of artillery may be carried
still further, without prejudice to the whole conduct of war, must be
left for experience to decide.
The principal results we obtain from the whole of these considerations,
are—
1. That infantry is the chief arm, to which the other two are
subordinate.
2. That by the exercise of great skill and energy in command, the want
of the two subordinate arms may in some measure be compensated for,
provided that we are much stronger in infantry; and the better the
infantry the easier this may be done.
3. That it is more difficult to dispense with artillery than with
cavalry, because it is the chief principle of destruction, and its mode
of fighting is more amalgamated with that of infantry.
4. That artillery being the strongest arm, as regards destructive
action, and cavalry the weakest in that respect, the question must in
general arise, how much artillery can we have without inconvenience,
and what is the least proportion of cavalry we require?
CHAPTER V. Order of Battle of an Army
The order of battle is that division and formation of the different
arms into separate parts or sections of the whole Army, and that form
of general position or disposition of those parts which is to be the
norm throughout the whole campaign or war.
It consists, therefore, in a certain measure, of an arithmetical and a
geometrical element, _the division_ and the _form of disposition_. The
first proceeds from the permanent peace organisation of the army;
adopts as units certain parts, such as battalions, squadrons, and
batteries, and with them forms units of a higher order up to the
highest of all, the whole army, according to the requirements of
predominating circumstances. In like manner, the form of disposition
comes from the elementary tactics, in which the army is instructed and
exercised in time of peace, which must be looked upon as a property in
the troops that cannot be essentially modified at the moment war breaks
out, the disposition connects these tactics with the conditions which
the use of the troops in war and in large masses demands, and thus it
settles in a general way the rule or norm in conformity with which the
troops are to be drawn up for battle.
This has been invariably the case when great armies have taken the
field, and there have been times when this form was considered as the
most essential part of the battle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account