We see, therefore, that the day is pretty well occupied with such a
march; that the fatigue endured by a soldier loaded with his pack for
ten or twelve hours is not to be judged of by that of an ordinary
journey of three miles on foot which a person, on tolerable roads,
might easily get over in five hours.
The longest marches to be found in exceptional instances are of five,
or at most six miles a day; for a continuance four.
A march of five miles requires a halt for several hours; and a division
of 8,000 men will not do it, even on a good road, in less than sixteen
hours. If the march is one of six miles, and that there are several
divisions in the column, we may reckon upon at least twenty hours.
We here mean the march of a number of whole divisions at once, from one
camp to another, for that is the usual form of marches made on a
theatre of war. When several divisions are to march in one column, the
first division to move is assembled and marched off earlier than the
rest, and therefore arrives at its camping ground so much the sooner.
At the same time this difference can still never amount to the whole
time, which corresponds to the depth of a division on the line of
march, and which is so well expressed in French, as the time it
requires for its _découlement_ (running down). The soldier is,
therefore, saved very little fatigue in this way, and every march is
very much lengthened in duration in proportion as the number of troops
to be moved increases. To assemble and march off the different brigades
of a division, in like manner at different times, is seldom
practicable, and for that reason we have taken the division itself as
the unit.
In long distances, when troops march from one cantonment into another,
and go over the road in small bodies, and without points of assembly,
the distance they go over daily may certainly be increased, and in
point of fact it is so, from the necessary detours in getting to
quarters.
But those marches, on which troops have to assemble daily in divisions,
or perhaps in corps, and have an additional move to get into quarters,
take up the most time, and are only advisable in rich countries, and
where the masses of troops are not too large, as in such cases the
greater facilility of subsistence and the advantage of the shelter
which the troops obtain compensate sufficiently for the fatigue of a
longer march. The Prussian army undoubtedly pursued a wrong system in
their retreat in 1806 in taking up quarters for the troops every night
on account of subsistence. They could have procured subsistence in
bivouacs, and the army would not have been obliged to spend fourteen
days in getting over fifty miles of ground, which, after all, they only
accomplished by extreme efforts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account